Printable View
I hate vote polls because almost all the votes are:
1. A friend of someone.
2. An account made for voting, so people can let themself win.
3. Guild voters.
4. A real voter who vote for the best, this is, I guess, 20 % of all the votes...
Not the best one wins but the one with the most friends or most self-made accounts... I think the dev team should choose the best, or, only people with 100+ posts are allowed to vote (we still have the friend voters...). Who agrees?
Thats a good idea to be honest... Winning by cheating is what i call lame
50/50 sometimes
Thanks :)
Social engineering ftw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fyrce
Lol... Anyone else agree/disagree?Quote:
Originally Posted by StompArtist
:-/ im gonna have to disagree on this one. I think the whole purpose of these contests is to bring more people/excitement to the forums.:) i get that you dont think its fair that the person with the most friends wins, but honestly there is no way to keep this from being the way things go. ;)
Sure there is, anything other than a community vote would work. It's a popularity contest simple as that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Appleisaac
Voting poles do seem a bit unfair... But what about other ones where you don't vote for someone?
Well honestly the popularity contest is part of the fun IMO :)
If the dev would choose the winners it won't make any sence and not persons with most friends win but the people who play unfairQuote:
Originally Posted by Appleisaac
The dev team choose/people with 100+ posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trash