Is the truth 'STR doesn't give dmg but DEX does'?

I hope I'm speaking sth which is correct.

I'm an archer user but I wanna suggests sth..

One of my friend just tested it out..(taking off the weapon) Warrior with 100 strength, the base dmg is still not really increased. But for archer, it increased 20+ dmg with 100dex.. I hope it can be proper comparison

I think this is why ppl r not really choosing warriors.. They actually want sth more than just being a sandbag. They also want to deal damages(more than now). I think STR should increase base damage.. As the was it is supposed to be.

I think for warriors, str shd give dmg
for archers, dex shd
and for enchantess, int shd.

Dex still should give damage for archers.

Str just seems to focus on making you last longer but they can't really do much in the way of damage. I do realize your playing the 'tank class but the description also says your a "warrior" ;)

I think the Str attribute should add some sort of damage modifier for warrior classes

agreed with philip there :D

Agreed as well.

STR should be the main damage stat (add damage to melee weapons, some damage to some bows and thrown weapons) and the HP stat (and HP regen)

DEX would add "To Hit" bonuses to weapons, add some damage (maybe half of what STR gives) to missile weapons and is the Dodge stat.

INT is the mana stat (and Mana regen) and could add damage to all spells.

That way there would be a reason to put points into all/most stats.