Psn , bf3?

[Roberto077]

You know what's fun?

Joining a game and trapping players in the corner while using an asian accent.

Kevin1811? What is Call of Duty? This is Modern Warfare 2, not Call of Duty.

[Spyce]

Kevin1811? What is Call of Duty? This is Modern Warfare 2, not Call of Duty.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAsxFQ...%3DvmAsxFQbEg4


I do this all the time with my friends!

[Cahaun]

The things that can happen in Battlefield can be so... unique.

[grenadiers]

you my friend sound very ignorant. There is way more skill requirements to be good in cod then just reaction time. Do you think people with high kill counts every game just run around cluelessly until they see someone and they just react fast? No. You have to be able to read the spawns, know which way the majority of the players are going to be going, plan out your flanking tactic on the run, and still be accurate and fast enough to pull it off when you are going up against 4-6 players trying to kill you. With just reaction time alone you will not succeed in having many kills each game. Your kdr might be good but that's about it.

You can succeed without knowing any of those things. Plus, all of the things you listed are essentially in all PvP multiplayer games. And if you don't know the spawns, you can still easily find out where the people are going since there is a giant indicator over the objective.

Plus, when you can kill someone with a single shot from most guns, reaction time plays a huge part, whereas in a game like Halo or League or legends or even some parts of Pocket Legends, you take more than a single shot to die, so you can counter and disorient your opponent.

Sure, there may be map components, but when it comes down to combat, it's whoever hits first.

(CoD duty has been known for it's terrible spawning system since Black Ops)

I wasn't aware that we were talking about hardcore? Because in the game in normal you it takes 3-4 easily and you will get out gunned if you do not have good accuracy. Unless you are going up against a noob. But black ops 2 matches you with players of equal skill for the most part. And I never said you couldn't succeed without knowing them. I'm just saying there is definitely a big gap between the players who do and the ones who don't. I have seen many sucky people with a very fast reaction time. And not in all cases will you both see each other at the same time.

[Roberto077]

I wasn't aware that we were talking about hardcore? Because in the game in normal you it takes 3-4 easily and you will get out gunned if you do not have good accuracy. Unless you are going up against a noob. But black ops 2 matches you with players of equal skill for the most part. And I never said you couldn't succeed without knowing them. I'm just saying there is definitely a big gap between the players who do and the ones who don't. I have seen many sucky people with a very fast reaction time. And not in all cases will you both see each other at the same time.

Not Hardcore. MLG. Huge difference.

[Dusk Will Decend]

What have I done. O_o

I've been gone, sorry for lack of involvement in the conversation.

Here's my two sense.
I'm extremely good, with a 9.00 kdr in black ops 1 ( not exactly hard to get running dogs and using Famas ) and also I have a 3.97 kdr on Battlefield 3, which is extremely hard to do, seeing as to how I'm a warrant officer III, ( l36 to you CoD noobs ). I'm soon going to start commentary videos/breakdowns/ suggestion/ you-make-my-loadout vids, so be mindful of that! I'll be posting link as soon as my HDpvr gets here.


On the topic of PS3/Xbox, the ancient question: which is better?

It's a matter of preference. That's it.

For me personally, it has nothing to do with the skill levels of the people who play multiplayer, because I'm mainly a bf3 fanboy. In bf3 someone who's a colonel 100 can drop you as easily as a private first class. It's the more diverse game, in terms of comparing CoD and BF. ( which i rarely like doing, they're their oen games people xD )

I prefer Sony, over Microsoft. There are various reasons, and some of them are wholly biasef. I DO enjoy Xbox, and I have both however. I grew up on PS1, to 2, and on. I will continue to grow into the next gen. I played xbox for Fable exclusively, and a bit of Halo.

So coming from my unbiased standpoint, I prefer PS3. Everything from the fluidity of rje menus, to the comfortably fitted controller.


So if you have ps3, come join me! If not, I'll add you on Live as well, just for the lulz. Thank everyone for your contributions, and helping to make the thread such a success.

[Roberto077]

Xbox 360 >/= PS3
PS4 > Xbox One

In my opinion, that is.

[Revealing]

^^ Ay caramba

[Freobr]

Xbox 360 >/= PS3
PS4 > Xbox One

In my opinion, that is.

As for this thing, XBOX One did a lot of changes to their console during the releasing. For now XBOX has a better controller in different aspects that has been reviewed many times and proved that this is the case. PS3 seems to have a little bit better processor but at the end of the day both processors are really strong so I don't really see a reason why not to buy XBOX One for that reason because both consoles won't lag. XBOX changed the feature that loaning games will now be free of charge. The battle between
these consoles will be pretty much the same but the thing that PS changed from 3 to 4 was that the internet thing costs now just like XBOX. This will probably smaller their
number of customers. I've heard that exclusive games are better at PS4 but I don't really mind because I don't play them. Overall both consoles are really similar like last
time and it all depends what have you been used to and which system do you like.

[Roberto077]

As for this thing, XBOX One did a lot of changes to their console during the releasing. For now XBOX has a better controller in different aspects that has been reviewed many times and proved that this is the case. PS3 seems to have a little bit better processor but at the end of the day both processors are really strong so I don't really see a reason why not to buy XBOX One for that reason because both consoles won't lag. XBOX changed the feature that loaning games will now be free or charge. The battle between
these consoles will be pretty much the same but the thing that PS changed from 3 to 4 was that the internet thing costs now just like XBOX. This will probably smaller their
number of customers. I've heard that exclusive games are better at PS4 but I don't really mind because I don't play them. Overall both consoles are really similar like last
time and it all depends what have you been used to and which system do you like.

I definitely like the PS4 exclusives better. Since Bungie hadn't worked on a PS game before, they wanted to release exclusive PS content for Destiny, and Activision was more into PS CoD, so Ghosts is getting exclusives on XBox (Activision is working with Bungie on Destiny, so they needed to find a way to straighten it out.)

I'd much rather have a revolutionary game (Destiny) exclusive than Call of Duty Ghosts. Mostly because Call of Duty can't change to be like Destiny. Destiny is a multi-open world shooter RPG game whereas Ghosts is another FPS. I don't mean to make Ghosts sound like a bad game, I mean to say that it isn't changing the face of console gaming in the same magnitude as Destiny might.

[DocDoBig]

Xbox 1 will be watching you.


I'm serious.

[Itoopeo]

Cod and bf are lame.
Only saints row skyrim and gta v are good

[saiyen]

Cod and bf are lame.
Only saints row skyrim and gta v are good

Lol
Saints row sucks!

[Roberto077]

Cod and bf are lame.
Only saints row skyrim and gta v are good

It's a matter of opinion.

[Itoopeo]

Even nfs mostwanted2 is better than cod and bf

[Roberto077]

Even nfs mostwanted2 is better than cod and bf

Opinion.

[Trenton]

Opinion.

You get em' Rob!

[saiyen]

It's a matter of opinion.

Its a matter of fact

[Roberto077]

Its a matter of fact

And opinion.

[Itoopeo]

Its a matter of fact

And opinion.

Opinion you have in your pants!