Arcane maul now weaker than legend clamore.....

[Doomreaper]

All I'm saying is that unless the new Mythic warrior weapon is a shield, it will be the best weapon for a level41 warrior. That glaive is already challenging enough for it.

If it is another shield I am going to cry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ancestor]

To some, the weapon they use is a portion of the fun. If the maul is not as effective as they thought it was, they're not having as much fun now, are they? In order to have fun again, they'll want to pick up an effective weapon.

As of right now, IMO, it has come down to playstyle. Are you more aggressive? Pick sword. Are you more tanky? Pick maul.

You Dont Have To Have A Maul, Any Legendary Will Do, It Might Seem Hard To Believe But You Dont Need Millions To Have Fun Im A Game.

[Cero]

You Dont Have To Have A Maul, Any Legendary Will Do, It Might Seem Hard To Believe But You Dont Need Millions To Have Fun Im A Game.

Yes i agree but that isnt the point here.
Maul is still greater than any legendary weapon because of the proc aoe stun that can change the game flow.
Those legendaries are still good but maul is better when it comes to clashes in pvp or pve.
The proc is what makes it better for a group fight or controlling crowds in pve.

[Zeus]

You Dont Have To Have A Maul, Any Legendary Will Do, It Might Seem Hard To Believe But You Dont Need Millions To Have Fun Im A Game.

I'm not saying you do, but to some, having millions and having super gear is the entire point of having fun in the game. That's why they gear themselves out!

[Xeusx]

You Dont Have To Have A Maul, Any Legendary Will Do, It Might Seem Hard To Believe But You Dont Need Millions To Have Fun Im A Game.

*sigh*
Troll?
Enough for those off topic
Maul is the 1st most great weapon for warrior, magmatic is the 2nd, why? Maul have great proc and magmatic too, look like they are almost same weapon.., so are you need millions to have fun? No.

[Sceazikua]

Auto attack is not determined by DPS. DPS is an inaccurate stat which you should not really pay any attention too. Why? It assumes the opponent has NO defense.

Increased stat damage does not mean increased skill damage. Well, it does generally but it is also more classified then that. Mauls generally will have lower skill damage then a comparable sword, which is why it gets higher attack damage.

This is something ported over from PL in all legend titles.

Yea Ive seen 1v1's about rogue vs mauler, and each swing of the mauler took almost 1/5 hp not counting skill lol.

[eugene9707]

Lets not forget about the itemization thing
http://www.spacetimestudios.com/show...Next-Expansion

there will be better legendary weapons coming lol

and if the ones now is close to maul .... gl lol

[Serancha]

The fact remains that, bugs aside, an arcane weapon from 10 levels ago should not be surpassing the new weapons in all aspects.

[Energizeric]

The fact remains that, bugs aside, an arcane weapon from 10 levels ago should not be surpassing the new weapons in all aspects.

Agreed! I just really wish they would make the stats page correct. I'm tired of all these issues. How is one to accurately judge which gear is best? Must I actually purchase each and every item, and spend time testing and plotting the data on an excel sheet? Really?

I don't really care which items are better and how they calculate damage and other things, but the stat page MUST accurately reflect what is going on or else there is no way for players to know how useful our gear is.