Discussion - Should Guild Age Be A Guild Rank Criteria?

[inkredible]

http://www.spacetimestudios.com/show...Year-1-Summary

Aze,

The above link is your prize for that commendable effort. However, if they add this statistic, it won't change much. The new merger guilds just switch to an old guild name. It's pretty simple, so at most the "veteran" guilds won't even look like veterans.

You wanted your prize? I just gave you it.

@Ink
That is exactly my point. Is that what people will have to resort to? That's silly! You're right, however. If I wanted to, I just grab some guild names from old friends in PL or use some of my own. It is that easy. Then, that makes it once again a statistic that's unfair and immovable.

I get that y'all want respect for being old and maintaining your position and I just linked you the thread that gave it. This, however, is not a good solution for that.

not really because i know h2n combined the members from the other guilds to the name chosen.. no effort for you.

[Zeus]

not really because i know h2n combined the members from the other guilds to the name chosen.. no effort for you.

I didn't really get what you were saying other than proving my point...It really doesn't take much effort to pick an older guild name and then going into it.

@Aze
Exactly why it shouldn't happen. It's not going to make DM #1. All I would have to do is grab my older guild names and the problem is solved. So, it's really just a silly statistic to have in there.

Also, yes it does? It shows you were ranked #1 3 more times than EoS. It also shows that the lowest rank that you've ever achieved is rank 5 and that was a mere 1 time.