I kid you not, Lia is good with both of her toons.Originally Posted by Crowsfoot
I kid you not, Lia is good with both of her toons.
so the post of this thread was to get people to ask for "free arcane rings for everyone"
I was crazy before it was fashionable.
I've known lia (spell, blackymagic, milk, etc.) since season 4... I know. I also know I beat her mage with an arcane ring at level 40. Although, she kicked my asprin when she used Singe instead of Samael. It just came down to if she crit lightning she won, buy if she didn't I won.
No, this thread is not for say that. But for say : "Nerf the ring"
No intention of that here. If you're trying to troll, please leave. I'm trying to keep this thread troll/flame/free.
That's still like 15m worth of gear, maybe 10 (idk the prices too well)It should not dramatize, even if the ring is op it s possible to beat the users normal way (I'm talking 1v1). It s hard but possible.
A exemple i have kill Zeus with a gear : mythic Armor, helm, mythic ring, mythic amulet, expedition bow of potency 41 and glacian pet.
Ad opposed to Zeus' 100+ mil
I brlieve that the best gear (arcane) should be the best obv but it shouldnt be leagues above other gear. I keep getting better and better gear lol and every time I am getting worse and worse because everyone else gets the gear faster than me lol
I think the problem is how sts has handled the development of rings. It's much different from weapons/helms/armors.
It's simple with the other 3...a mythic item is roughly the same as a legendary item is 5 levels ahead of it. Same with arcanes...the stats are similar to a legendary 10 lvls ahead of it.
But rings? Nope. Not so simple. Starting at around...lvl 20 rings have the +damage and such capped (+3.0). And then you're left with only two other modifiers for the ring.
The mythic and arcane ring DON'T follow the patterns of mythic & arcane gear. If the mythic ring did, it would just have the same stats as a lvl 35 ring. But it doesn't...in fact, it's still better than all the lvl 41 rings! That's no mythic pattern...the ring follows the pattern of an arcane item.
...and now we have a ring that actually has arcane rarity? Oh, goodness...just how many seasons is this going to be better than any legendary ring? Better until the 61 cap?
It's time for the legendary rings to be packing some more power. Let the lvl 41 rings have 3.5-4.0 damage. Have an additional modifier to them. Something. Fix them.
Because the legendary rings are broken, the "how can we outdo ourselves" arcane ring is absurdly overpowered. More overpowered than hooks seemed at 26, as hooks had their proper lifetime. The arcane ring, much like the mythic ring, is going to outmatch any other ring for much longer than it is supposed to.
Last edited by Morholt; 05-11-2014 at 09:54 PM.
Only those who risk going past the edge will find out how far they can go.
As a legendary-user, i understand that mythic/arcanes should be better than legendaries. I don't think the arcane ring should be nerfed until it becomes as saturated as the other arcane items (too many OP players kinda sets off a little too much ego/smugness). The game needs OP things to keep it interesting. To keep the hard-working farmers separated from the lazy chatterbugs (like me lol).
As a Warrior, the only class that are using Arcane Ring and that I have a chance to kill is a Mage. Rogue? Probably if he's not that talented.
Back to the topic. Yeah Arcane Ring is a little OP.
Last edited by Froxanthar; 05-11-2014 at 10:14 PM.
The arcane ring is not OP. The difference is this large because of the enormous gap between a lvl31 mythic ring to a lvl41 arcane one - let's count together.
Mythic - top for two seasons (including its release season). So lvl31 ring theoretically stops being top at lvl36.
Arcane - top for three seasons (including its release season). So lvl41 ring theoretically stops being top at lvl51.
So is Rendtail's ring overpowered more than its arcane rarity suggests? No.
Is the PvP part of the game pay2win? Hell yeah.
Weak, Dora counts in Spanish.
Joke aside, this sums up why the arcane ring is on base.
Yeah it is OP.
Its still possible to beat a mage with sam, arcane staff, arcane ring and mythics whether he is skilled or not.
If it is a blade rogue you need a Samael, some darn good skills, Exceptional gems and a perfect fight. If the rogues uses a bow then just forget it.
If its a war just forget it.
This is from a mythic set | mythic amulet | Magmatic claymore | emberglow ring | Grimm | war user. The more mythics and arcanes you have the better your odds are. Samael, Slag, Grimm(?) Are the best.
legendary vs arcane? 1k vs 100m?
Arcanes were suposed to be OP (not applied for kershal though), werent it?
Damage and armor/hp levels are unbalanced at endgame. They are not at an equal ratio and therefore, the damage seems OP. It's equal to all the other arcanes, except we are wearing old gear.
Credits to Iady
Us smurfs are still struggling to kill warriors using magmatic T.T we are even squishy with arcane ring.
But if found that we use the new magma armor,I think I use magma of security?,I'm get much better results vs a warrior.I wish gale didn't put +25%speed with the "WOOOOOOOSH" upgrade.I would love to use the 50% armor with the speed boost but without the sling shot =p almost 2k armor + speed would be nice to use(I just really dislike the sling shot )
Last edited by Spell; 05-12-2014 at 12:47 AM.
Freelancer that crawly was getting annoying lol
arcane ring should be OP as it cost 100mil+.
also this is lvl41 arcane.
u r saying as if when u enter u only see a group full of arcane ring users everytime.
those that are using arcane ring has spent lot dollars and those arcane rings users tht are skilled has spent alot of time+dollars.
its fair i say.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks