Mage = Slag or grimm

[obee]

the poll is rigged. Supposed to be "which is better pve pet" not which is better pet (overall).

zzzzzz lol

[Sirnoobalot]

Hmmm i think mage=smurf.

[Xeusx]

Grimm's AA and the passive level 40 debuffs can stack, 15% armor stack with 10-15% armor O_O
I don't know if this has been confirmed..

[Alhuntrazeck]

Both are great pets imo and situational. I'll have to go with slag on this one however; if it does panic you can take down gangs of 2v1, even 3v1 if you're damn lucky or fighting 3 rogues (arcane rings are exceptions ofc).

I proved this point by killing 2 warriors in a 2v1 (they know who they are, I won't gloat) and a mauler in a 1v1 (also knows who he is). Gotta love those triple locks! FB -> slag -> FB...GG.

Grimm has ridiculous debuffs and for that reason alone I'd buy him. Its auto has 5 different debuffs - this means at least one will be attacking you almost every hit. Its AA also does banish and -10% crit (which just about screws up mages, who already have low crit to begin with) and -10% armor. Passive has a chance to proc -20% armor, -35% hit chance, -20 int str dex. All in all, a great pet.

However I am leaning more towards slag because we ARE the stunning class, after all. A mage who can stunlock is amazingly strong if you play it right!

[Dex Scene]

I like slag more than grimm and slag suits my play style.

[Instanthumor]

Both are great pets imo and situational. I'll have to go with slag on this one however; if it does panic you can take down gangs of 2v1, even 3v1 if you're damn lucky or fighting 3 rogues (arcane rings are exceptions ofc).

I proved this point by killing 2 warriors in a 2v1 (they know who they are, I won't gloat) and a mauler in a 1v1 (also knows who he is). Gotta love those triple locks! FB -> slag -> FB...GG.

Grimm has ridiculous debuffs and for that reason alone I'd buy him. Its auto has 5 different debuffs - this means at least one will be attacking you almost every hit. Its AA also does banish and -10% crit (which just about screws up mages, who already have low crit to begin with) and -10% armor. Passive has a chance to proc -20% armor, -35% hit chance, -20 int str dex. All in all, a great pet.

However I am leaning more towards slag because we ARE the stunning class, after all. A mage who can stunlock is amazingly strong if you play it right!

OP asked which was better for pve... As I said the poll is rigged gg

[notfaded1]

Both are great but for PvE, I found Slag's AA much better. The armor and hit% debuffs on Grimm sure are nice but can't compare to a high panic chance that works on everything in about three times the range of Grimm's AA.

Once again... I agree with Omni! It's the range and also it just seems to work more often. It's like even as much as I love sam... He doesn't banish very often but with slag you know what he's gonna do every time.