Clan wars

[Universalpro]

Dont know if this is a bad or a good idea but i will just share it.
Almost everyone here must be playing other games and must have experienced clan wars in some game atleast.
How about we do it in al? We all know twink guild clashes are the most fun to play. We have guilds here so we can call it "guild wars".
Believe me guild clashes would be much much more fun to play rather than pvping with random players.
And we set up a score for the guild wars in the form of wins/losses.
Furthermore we can keep prizes every month for the top 10 guilds
But for keeping prizes this system would be necessary -
Every guildie recieves points for the guild wars they have won.
Then we can give prizes to those guildies who have more than a certain no. Of points so that a person who joined the guild towards the end of the month and did no pvp will not recieve any prize.
For e.g - 5 pts for winning 1 guild war and the minimum limit for giving prizes could be set to 1000 pts.
This will promote pvp a lot.
I know ppl will be complaining karma will own every1 and some guilds are op while some are not as good and do not have good gear but hey, its always been that way. Its survival of the fittest
And its not necessary to go against karma. U can go against other guilds.
Prizes can be certain amount of gold/plat to the top 10 clans.

[aarrgggggg]

Lol what town hall are you?

What Clan, and your ign? I'll look you up.

Im town hall 9, My ign is aarrgggggg and my clan is devilsrejectz2

[Universalpro]

Lol what town hall are you?

What Clan, and your ign? I'll look you up.

Im town hall 9, My ign is aarrgggggg and my clan is devilsrejectz2

I m not only talking about clash of clans lol..
There are other online games, Mmropgs, Rpgs which have such clan wars and they are the only reason why pros play those.
After coming to a certain level they are the only reason left for some ppl go continue playing that game.
I play a game called " Gunz" and its the same with me there.

[radagan]

Well here it should call "guild war"

[Xeusx]

Lol what town hall are you?

What Clan, and your ign? I'll look you up.

Im town hall 9, My ign is aarrgggggg and my clan is devilsrejectz2

I m not only talking about clash of clans lol..
There are other online games, Mmropgs, Rpgs which have such clan wars and they are the only reason why pros play those.
After coming to a certain level they are the only reason left for some ppl go continue playing that game.
I play a game called " Gunz" and its the same with me there.

You guys should talk on topic not off topic, lol.

[siddhant]

Dont know if this is a bad or a good idea but i will just share it.
Almost everyone here must be playing other games and must have experienced clan wars in some game atleast.
How about we do it in al? We all know twink guild clashes are the most fun to play. We have guilds here so we can call it "guild wars".
Believe me guild clashes would be much much more fun to play rather than pvping with random players.
And we set up a score for the guild wars in the form of wins/losses.
Furthermore we can keep prizes every month for the top 10 guilds
But for keeping prizes this system would be necessary -
Every guildie recieves points for the guild wars they have won.
Then we can give prizes to those guildies who have more than a certain no. Of points so that a person who joined the guild towards the end of the month and did no pvp will not recieve any prize.
For e.g - 5 pts for winning 1 guild war and the minimum limit for giving prizes could be set to 1000 pts.
This will promote pvp a lot.
I know ppl will be complaining karma will own every1 and some guilds are op while some are not as good and do not have good gear but hey, its always been that way. Its survival of the fittest
And its not necessary to go against karma. U can go against other guilds.
Prizes can be certain amount of gold/plat to the top 10 clans.

Really good idea and the match should start only when there are 5players in each team and once there are 5 members the member will be asked to nominate a captain and the guy with most votes will be captain and on winning a clash suppose u need 30 points to win and u will be given 1 point for killing 1 member the first team to 30 points win and that team gets 10 points and it is upon the captain to decide which members will get how many points based on their participation and no swap should be allowed which means once match start one cant join even if some 1 dc and then the team will have to fight 4vs 5 these are my suggestions ty.

[Universalpro]

Really good idea and the match should start only when there are 5players in each team and once there are 5 members the member will be asked to nominate a captain and the guy with most votes will be captain and on winning a clash suppose u need 30 points to win and u will be given 1 point for killing 1 member the first team to 30 points win and that team gets 10 points and it is upon the captain to decide which members will get how many points based on their participation and no swap should be allowed which means once match start one cant join even if some 1 dc and then the team will have to fight 4vs 5 these are my suggestions ty.

We could form a "guild war party" which could be of 3 or 4 or 5 ppl.
We can do 3v3 or 4v4 or 5v5 clashes.
I have a better idea rather than counting the no. Of kills we could make rounds. Like thr could be 10 rounds and the team who wins more wins the war.
This will change the whole pvp system of al lol.
Well i dont really see many suggestions here.. Guess it isnt that interesting after all

[epicrrr]

III Epicr
Dragon level 4 for war [ 0/30 ]

[Azateenice]

It Will be Fun for sure! Guild War ��

[siddhant]

We could form a "guild war party" which could be of 3 or 4 or 5 ppl.
We can do 3v3 or 4v4 or 5v5 clashes.
I have a better idea rather than counting the no. Of kills we could make rounds. Like thr could be 10 rounds and the team who wins more wins the war.
This will change the whole pvp system of al lol.
Well i dont really see many suggestions here.. Guess it isnt that interesting after all

the problem with no score would be if some goes afk or keeps running and gets back to his team then i dont think so sts system will understand that the other team won the round and no suggesions from othe ppl since pve>pvp in al and implementing this system would be tough ty.

[Universalpro]

the problem with no score would be if some goes afk or keeps running and gets back to his team then i dont think so sts system will understand that the other team won the round and no suggesions from othe ppl since pve>pvp in al and implementing this system would be tough ty.

I never said there would be no score.
By rounds i mean if its a 3v3, one team wins the round when all 3 players of other team are dead and hence the score would become 1-0

And well yeah.. U r right about pve being more famous than pvp

[siddhant]

I never said there would be no score.
By rounds i mean if its a 3v3, one team wins the round when all 3 players of other team are dead and hence the score would become 1-0

And well yeah.. U r right about pve being more famous than pvp

complicates stuff for sts to implement and they focusing on new expansion atm so nvm to suggest