The Gem Disparity

[Ssneakykills]

How about nerfing para gems but not rendering them useless by doing so?

[Tatman]

I've said it multiple times - para gems should have never been introduced. The amounts of damage we see at endgame and some popular twinking levels just aren't healthy for the game. The side effect of the para+eye combo - i.e. making most other gems borderline useless - isn't good either.

That being said, I doubt STS will impose any limitations like those discussed here. Making new cap gear ineligible for para gemming means a lot of endgamers just won't run next Halloween event or whenever para gems return (if they return at all). Making para gems lvl 42+ means a lot of twinks won't run. Obviously, such scenarios aren't good for STS financial health.

[Oursizes]

Dude u guys still didn't get it. If para gems r limited for high level only means they to be gemmed for level 42+ gears only. Even if new gears being released for twinks doesn't make sense cuz they will be low level. Clearly no minimum requirement (I.e level 42+ gears) will meet.

Mainly vanities were the event reward does it hits that hard if the 3 different class of mythic set being a lb reward? I don't think so mate.

Para gems should never be tradable. Enough damage is done when it comes to twinking and even endgame. Restricting usage and gemming to high level gears will completely stop para twinking.

And one more thing, u talking about para gem destroying endgame at first point and at bottom u want to put at arena chest and make it tradable? Lmao dude. Too much confusion

I said if they are lootable. Knowing sts, they will bend over backwards and add them only to locks. If this happens no one will play this game, personally I believe this gaming is reaching to the point of one of those casino games, where you just tap the button and hope you get lucky.
This is why I suggested add them to arena chest and make tradeable..