Suggestion: GvG & zone capturing

[Sandeeep]

1. Players are rich .. mega rich gold doesnt apply to them
2. Ten guilds can be made np for plauers
3. Guildmaster can own all 10guilds by having multiple accounts . No need to leave a guild for that. Multiple account controlled by 1 player is enough.
Remember gold isnt a issue for top players

In arlor there are tons of crazy players wanting to become the BEST .
This is what i tried to tell u in the previous posts
I knew u needed a step by step talk.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

[tasakli]

1. Players are rich .. mega rich gold doesnt apply to them
2. Ten guilds can be made np for plauers
3. Guildmaster can own all 10guilds by having multiple accounts . No need to leave a guild for that. Multiple account controlled by 1 player is enough.
Remember gold isnt a issue for top players

In arlor there are tons of crazy players wanting to become the BEST .
This is what i tried to tell u in the previous posts
I knew u needed a step by step talk.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

1. You cant just conquer all the zones with gold, you would need some good pvpers.

2. That was just an example. There are ~4 zones in each 'place'. One guild costs 250k so I dont think someone would spend that much on making alt guilds. +costs to attack every single day +upkeep. I think they would rather fight for it. Like u said, those players dont need to farm for gold, why spend millions per day to farm then?

3. I dont think someone has that many accounts to plan a fake attack on every single zone, because at least the defenders would have to show up. Zone would be lost or for sale if both sides don't show up.

Please continue

[Sandeeep]

If ppl would have to pay for attacking a zone.. nobody would even attack it in the first place.
Even if it was a fair match not alot of ppl with battle for a zone
Unless its glintstone and underhul
Ur idea might be good but here are the downsides

Instead of a guild vs guild y not make it all guilds can partcipate. And no cost for attacking
Thus no reason for fake guilds.
All players can attck for free. Even pvp'ers who prefer to stay guildless

Increase the rewards . Add temp buffs
Its a good idea but has lots of loopholes its kinda good. But try to make it foolproof

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

[tasakli]

If ppl would have to pay for attacking a zone.. nobody would even attack it in the first place.
Even if it was a fair match not alot of ppl with battle for a zone
Unless its glintstone and underhul
Ur idea might be good but here are the downsides

Instead of a guild vs guild y not make it all guilds can partcipate. And no cost for attacking
Thus no reason for fake guilds.
All players can attck for free. Even pvp'ers who prefer to stay guildless

Increase the rewards . Add temp buffs
Its a good idea but has lots of loopholes its kinda good. But try to make it foolproof

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

Why would people not want it? U just said that there are people who wants to be the BEST. So you would go for the zones right?
Low level zones would be captured by other guilds with less pvp skills because the good people wouldnt care about them, they would go for the maps like glintstone and underhul, like u said.
How can someone win if everyone can just enter? And making attacks free would stimulate fake attacks.

Thanks, I will update the post soon!

[Sandeeep]

How wpuod it stimulate fake attacks
Open to all plauers . Which ever player wins the players respective guild wins

U said we have to pay to attack. But the buffs u gave dont seem worth while. Top players already use elix for better stats. 5% bonus isnt really much if we mist pay per attack

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

[tasakli]

How wpuod it stimulate fake attacks
Open to all plauers . Which ever player wins the players respective guild wins

U said we have to pay to attack. But the buffs u gave dont seem worth while. Top players already use elix for better stats. 5% bonus isnt really much if we mist pay per attack

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

It would stimulate fake attacks because it would require less to plan fake attacks. Only cost would be the upkeep and making guild then.
Open to all players seems like an ok idea. But my point was to make guilds have more use.
The buffs are just an example. Of course it could be better, but have to keep it fair.

[Sandeeep]

As much as i believe planning an attack from a guild is hard .. cooperation from some guilds are tough
Open to all players from all guilds at the same time

Perhaps this idea may be better
Assume a player conquers a area, then his guild he represents irrespective if the guild helpped or not recieves the buff ( make the buff bigger to like 30% and crit for 7% ) maybe.... and let all plaurs from all guilds clash it out together simultanously instead of one vs one

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

[tasakli]

As much as i believe planning an attack from a guild is hard .. cooperation from some guilds are tough
Open to all players from all guilds at the same time

Perhaps this idea may be better
Assume a player conquers a area, then his guild he represents irrespective if the guild helpped or not recieves the buff ( make the buff bigger to like 30% and crit for 7% ) maybe.... and let all plaurs from all guilds clash it out together simultanously instead of one vs one

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

That would be a mass fight. Btw with one vs one I mean 3 players of a guild vs 3 players of another guild.

[Sandeeep]

Not much co-operation will do
Yes a mass fight is what i suggest

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

[tasakli]

Other thoughts?

[tasakli]

bringing back

[kydrian]

Seems nice but it won't bring back end game PvP. Endgame PvP will be the same only difference is this gvg will probably be the only active PvP section. As for Trulle forest / Blood beach/ CTF crypts will be dead. And keeping it upkeeped eh, no. For a small buff? No.

Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk

[tasakli]

Seems nice but it won't bring back end game PvP. Endgame PvP will be the same only difference is this gvg will probably be the only active PvP section. As for Trulle forest / Blood beach/ CTF crypts will be dead. And keeping it upkeeped eh, no. For a small buff? No.

Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk

Wouldn't you join the gvg's? I think a lot of people would. So it actualy would motivate to cap and pvp endgame.
And if not, maybe there could be an option added for a level range required to join the fight.
Upkeep is not only for buff, but for fame also, a lb of guilds who own the most territories for example.
Have to be realistic and not think of huge buff.

[kydrian]

Wouldn't you join the gvg's? I think a lot of people would. So it actualy would motivate to cap and pvp endgame.
And if not, maybe there could be an option added for a level range required to join the fight.
Upkeep is not only for buff, but for fame also, a lb of guilds who own the most territories for example.
Have to be realistic and not think of huge buff.

Yea the battle for the locations is nice and all but buffs no. We already have plenty of elixirs/craftable ones/ house locations. And you don't seem to understand stand what I said about PvP. He said it'll bring PvP back alive in endgame. It really won't it'll just make the gvg most active PvP section. As of right now endgame is dead the only map everyone plays is TDM blood beach. CTF is dead, trulle is dead. Only reason I see Blood beach is alive because its the third released map for PvP. So do you understand. Since its a newly released one its alive, what happens if gvg comes? PvP maps will be completely dead and the only competition will be in guilds vs guilds.

Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk

[Ufern]

Nice idea but..all the zones would be controlled by top guilds like purge or smth like that.
They'll receive tons of loot and these chests,wont they?))
It'll be just another way for gettin all the best for these guilds.

Отправлено с моего HUAWEI NXT-L29 через Tapatalk

[tasakli]

Nice idea but..all the zones would be controlled by top guilds like purge or smth like that.
They'll receive tons of loot and these chests,wont they?))
It'll be just another way for gettin all the best for these guilds.

Отправлено с моего HUAWEI NXT-L29 через Tapatalk

Tbh I don't think just one guild would be able to own all territories because of the upkeep. Maybe good guilds would own high level zones, but that's the point of it. A nice reward for PvPers and their guilds.

[tasakli]

Yea the battle for the locations is nice and all but buffs no. We already have plenty of elixirs/craftable ones/ house locations. And you don't seem to understand stand what I said about PvP. He said it'll bring PvP back alive in endgame. It really won't it'll just make the gvg most active PvP section. As of right now endgame is dead the only map everyone plays is TDM blood beach. CTF is dead, trulle is dead. Only reason I see Blood beach is alive because its the third released map for PvP. So do you understand. Since its a newly released one its alive, what happens if gvg comes? PvP maps will be completely dead and the only competition will be in guilds vs guilds.

Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk

Don't think it would be the only active PvP section. You won't be busy fighting in a gvg all day. It could even make it all more active. People would go out to TDM, CTF to try/train PvPing together with their teams.

[Ufern]

Tbh I don't think just one guild would be able to own all territories because of the upkeep. Maybe good guilds would own high level zones, but that's the point of it. A nice reward for PvPers and their guilds.

Anyway u should wait for the answer of developers))

Отправлено с моего HUAWEI NXT-L29 через Tapatalk