Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: How much Armor actually protects - a Numa Prime Study!

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    Forum Adept kamikazees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    353
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arischal View Post
    I think armor is more effective against blasters... have you tested that out yet?
    I have not, but if you could test it we would all be eternally grateful!

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoIsThis View Post
    ...I believe that it is possible to get a commando with 600+ armor briefly. Maybe make a test and see if the extrapolation is correct?
    Based on your comment, I tested my lvl 25 Commando in full Sandstorm Armor with max level Increase Mass. Armor = exactly 700 in that case. The burrower enemy (sorry I don't know its name) did 17 average damage (15-19). Three guesses where that number (700x, 17y) fell on the graph, and the first two don't count:
    Name:  graph2.png
Views: 1367
Size:  5.5 KB
    The Slope of this line is now -1/51.7, which is nearly identical to the previous Slope. So what does it mean? It means that at least for this enemy, (1) it takes about 51.7 armor to reduce the damage that enemy does by 1 point; and (2) Armor rating is universal i.e. Commando armor doesn't protect "better" than Engineer armor.

    Sometimes more information raises more questions. Knowing this, do you think 6 points in Protection (60 Armor) is worth it? How about the Armor implant (50 armor)? Or max Increase Mass (300 Armor)?
    Last edited by kamikazees; 08-26-2011 at 02:35 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •