Sneak Peek: Guild Battlegrounds!

[glendame]

2v2, 3v3, 4v4,5v5 up to 10v10 as suggested, to accommodate smaller guilds. As some guilds don't have 10 powerhouse members online at the same time. Time limits 5mins interval starting at 10mins up to like 1hr 30min or so. Bets should be locked-in individually if possible and collected in auction or PvP cashier, individually. Also, an option for replacement/s as some may confirm to join and when war starts they, don't come online.

And NO class stacking please. Devs can figure this out. Or give an option to assign class and both guilds should agree and confirm.

[glendame]

Let's get ready to rumble. Nice job sts. Good luck!

[Zeus]

2v2, 3v3, 4v4,5v5 up to 10v10 as suggested, to accommodate smaller guilds. As some guilds don't have 10 powerhouse members online at the same time. Time limits 5mins interval starting at 10mins up to like 1hr 30min or so. Bets should be locked-in individually if possible and collected in auction or PvP cashier, individually. Also, an option for replacement/s as some may confirm to join and when war starts they, don't come online.

And NO class stacking please. Devs can figure this out. Or give an option to assign class and both guilds should agree and confirm.

Yes, class stacking sucks and ruins the experience for all...but developers are hesitant to implement it.

[Breakingbadxx]

From the information we have so far, its going to be warriors + mages vs warriors + mages skirmishes without a doubt.

Currently rogues are the easiest class to kill in team PvP. I speak from fresh experience, it literally takes 0 effort to kill a rogue in a team battle. To be truthful, i almost feel handicapped by having a rogue on my team (no offence to the rogue community).

This is from 4 vs 4 alone.

[Muteds]

cant wait for this !
warbyasah, emejing

[epicrrr]

From the information we have so far, its going to be warriors + mages vs warriors + mages skirmishes without a doubt.

Currently rogues are the easiest class to kill in team PvP. I speak from fresh experience, it literally takes 0 effort to kill a rogue in a team battle. To be truthful, i almost feel handicapped by having a rogue on my team (no offence to the rogue community).

This is from 4 vs 4 alone.

Down here at low level pvp we still value rog, esp those who knows how to chacha and with at least semi gear. We still need their crit. Class stacking warriors we usually counter with korrupt and put in a lot of rogs.

Rogs bane is another rog. They can one shot each other while rejoining fights, and they will snipe each other when nekro shield/nekro is down so its up to warriors to keep em up. A pro warrior make or break a clash. Mage well they hurt esp lightning.

-14

[Zeus]

Down here at low level pvp we still value rog, esp those who knows how to chacha and with at least semi gear. We still need their crit. Class stacking warriors we usually counter with korrupt and put in a lot of rogs.

Rogs bane is another rog. They can one shot each other while rejoining fights, and they will snipe each other when nekro shield/nekro is down so its up to warriors to keep em up. A pro warrior make or break a clash. Mage well they hurt esp lightning.

-14

Yes, but at end game...GL with any of that as a rogue. The heals are so intense, that any damage is outhealed by the heal cycle.

[marsu4u]

Purge & Magnum can finally settle their differences!

[Fsuryo]

Warior+mage?
Pft dude, its purely being a war era, a domination. A team with 10 war would eat any random classes team. Mage? Rog? Die

[Breakingbadxx]

Warior+mage?
Pft dude, its purely being a war era, a domination. A team with 10 war would eat any random classes team. Mage? Rog? Die

A team of 2 warriors 2 mages and 1 rogue can dominate a team of 5 warriors.

Before you ask...yes, this is the current AL.

Now, lets apply this to 10 vs 10:

*5 warriors 3 mages 2 rogues can dominate 10 warriors.

*A team consisting of warriors and mages will dominate a team solely consisting of warriors alone. (Why? A healing cycle that outheals all damage taken) > also why rogues aren't useful vs such a team.

So no, a 10 warrior team can't 'eat' a class diverse team.

[glendame]

A team of 2 warriors 2 mages and 1 rogue can dominate a team of 5 warriors.

Before you ask...yes, this is the current AL.

Now, lets apply this to 10 vs 10:

*5 warriors 3 mages 2 rogues can dominate 10 warriors.

*A team consisting of warriors and mages will dominate a team solely consisting of warriors alone. (Why? A healing cycle that outheals all damage taken) > also why rogues aren't useful vs such a team.

So no, a 10 warrior team can't 'eat' a class diverse team.

In paper yes. In accuatlity, maybe not.

[Breakingbadxx]

In paper yes. In accuatlity, maybe not.

There is no 'maybe' in experience. I speak from that experience.

I'm not putting theories on the table. This is fact.

How many have complained about warrior stacking in AL 2016 as opposed to mage stacking?

[glendame]

There is no 'maybe' in experience. I speak from that experience.

I'm not putting theories on the table. This is fact.

How many have complained about warrior stacking in AL 2016 as opposed to mage stacking?

U got 10v10 experience? Lol u think 10 mage will survive 10 warriors? Not even in a 5v5 mage will survive. Zzzz not experienced at all

There is no complaining of mage stacking as it does not impact PvP the way warriors stacking do. That's a fact from experience at being no 2 spot in tdm with NO dummy farming!

[Breakingbadxx]

The only reason people complain about mage stacking is because they arent used to it and pretty much everyone has already complained about warrior stack in the past and given up.

Since we are throwing facts around, here's one for you, a warrior stack will always be better than a mage stack.

More people have complained about warrior stack in the past 3 years of my AL experience than all complaints across all of the legends franchises.

It's the same handfuf of people complaining about mage stack, is it nott?

It would be wise to focus on the period 'guild battlegrounds' is being released rather than dwell on the past.

What reason would there currently be for complaining about warrior stacking?

'A warrior stack will always be better than a mage stack?' > sorry but many active PvP players (including me) will disagree with that 'fact'.

It is all too well known that a warrior stack is currently beatable using a class diverse team. I recently participated in a tdm clash:

Our team: 2 warriors 1 mage 1 rogue
The opposition: 3 warriors 1 mage (4 warriors at one point)

*All their warriors had the mythic glintstone axe set in their possession*

We won 5 matches in a row with each score not exceeding 20-9 before they decided to give up.

They stacked warriors and this was the result.

If they were to use 2 warriors and 2 mages instead, our class diverse team would've been dominated without a doubt (a theory proven by numerous cases with consistency).

Fact.

[xxalivexx]

Well this gold and platinum betting won't get you plenty of emails when the time comes, you already know kids will spend mamas money and get mad when the platinum they paid for is gone, then they email you making up excuses, I'd say you think about that platinum betting the most, other than that really sounds great, I'm prepared for this, release this fastttttt, very little patience sts, PLEASE FOR ME.

[Breakingbadxx]

These so called "active PvP players" are they by any chance you and your warrior friends?

Let's ask those asking for a buff to the rogue class for balance on the issue of mage stacking removing the need for the presence of a rogue in team PvP.

Sarcasm aside, take your time to look at the numerous threads (including those made by the developers themselves) on the subject of PvP balance and tell me how many times the word 'warrior' came up compared to the word 'mage'.

After that, let's keep the discussion on guild battlegrounds, thanks.

[Breakingbadxx]

Back at ya, bro.

Have a good day!

I don't understand why you quoted one of my comments and also quoted one section of another of my comments for that response.

[Zeus]

The only reason people complain about mage stacking is because they arent used to it and pretty much everyone has already complained about warrior stack in the past and given up.

Since we are throwing facts around, here's one for you, a warrior stack will always be better than a mage stack.

More people have complained about warrior stack in the past 3 years of my AL experience than all complaints across all of the legends franchises.

It's the same handfuf of people complaining about mage stack, is it nott?

No, a warrior stack will not be better than mage stack. Sorcerers can heal 8K HP per second while still putting out insane damage.

And yes, you read correctly...8K HP per second.

Let's ask those asking for a buff to the rogue class for balance on the issue of mage stacking removing the need for the presence of a rogue in team PvP.

Sarcasm aside, take your time to look at the numerous threads (including those made by the developers themselves) on the subject of PvP balance and tell me how many times the word 'warrior' came up compared to the word 'mage'.

After that, let's keep the discussion on guild battlegrounds, thanks.

Not to mention, sorcerer is the most popular class as of right now. I wonder, why would such a weak class be the most popular unless of course, it's actually very overpowered if used correctly?

[Anyona]

This thread is about Guild Battlegrounds, not which class is the best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Breakingbadxx]

This thread is about Guild Battlegrounds, not which class is the best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The existence of a 'best class' affects guild battlegrounds.