Warrior progression curve

[Luciano Lobo]

You should consider the overall time only. On easy/event bosses might be but on hard elite/mausoleum bosses I doubt it completely and will make a few seconds difference not minutes difference another reason why most of the tanks won't feel the change of weapon. Also you should add the harder playability you will have with your two-handed weapon on this maps and bosses with your low armor. In these cases the damage is made by the other classes most of the time leaving the roll of healer/"tanking" to warriors. I often see warrior chaging weapons on the course of the map and tbh does't change anything. You don't feel it when you play. The only real feel is the durability always. With the dusk aegis proc the mages curse mobs dont kill you in one or two hits wich is good. I just hope a real change in the feel way when you play with this new content. Now we will have explicit roles as attacker and defender.

[Ardbeg]

You should consider the overall time only. On easy/event bosses might be but on hard elite/mausoleum bosses I doubt it completely and will make a few seconds difference not minutes difference another reason why most of the tanks won't feel the change of weapon. Also you should add the harder playability you will have with your two-handed weapon on this maps and bosses with your low armor. In these cases the damage is made by the other classes most of the time leaving the roll of healer/"tanking" to warriors. I often see warrior chaging weapons on the course of the map and tbh does't change anything. You don't feel it when you play. The only real feel is the durability always. With the dusk aegis proc the mages curse mobs dont kill you in one or two hits wich is good. I just hope a real change in the feel way when you play with this new content. Now we will have explicit roles as attacker and defender.

The claymore is for bosses, and the aegis (myth) is for mobs. I love the new aegis, but aside from a pure luck setup it is not needed in current stage imho. I agree with you, the overall time is what counts, so why stretch it by limiting to only one weapon? Especially since the claymore is dang cheap. So far the maps are not very hard, and the mage course can be avoided with team work (no matter wether with or without tank or which weapons are used). All i am saying is, it is not too bad, tanks have options to go a bit more rogueish, and maps are not scaled to make tanks necessary yet. Everything else depends on playstyle and party. Where i disagree is that the damage of the dusk claymore doesn't make a difference on bosses.

[supersyan]

its suks when 3 warriors meet at mausoleum.boss fights is like scratching the surface of a rock with bare hands. Umbal mass vs warrior is never ending.

[Zeus]

its suks when 3 warriors meet at mausoleum.boss fights is like scratching the surface of a rock with bare hands. Umbal mass vs warrior is never ending.

Do you use cake to hammer in a nail? Well, I suppose you can, but you'll need a lot of cake and that's not a very efficient way to use cake.

The same concept can be applied here.

[supersyan]

Do you use cake to hammer in a nail? Well, I suppose you can, but you'll need a lot of cake and that's not a very efficient way to use cake.

The same concept can be applied here.

i got it. But its like using icecreams to hammer in a nail when meeting 3 warriors in musoleum.

[Kide2008]

hahah. do u believe in ur words? Warr now can kill anyone in pvp now. warr has one of the strongest wep arc sword. Hard elites- need warr cuz rog and mage wont live without warr's heal. All classes are have their stats. Call one of the class nab, says ppl who don't know anything about game

We don't talk about pvp . We are talking about PVE. So stop ur stupidity

[Vvildfire]

Sometimes I run Mausoleum, and when I do, not having a Warrior means I go splat, having no Rogue means we beat a rock (boss) with a stick