Warrior stats with legendary level 61 gear

[Ardbeg]

Since i just finished leveling (we did a mix: daily xp quests, new maps, underhuul 2+3, so we looted some new stuff and reached acolyte rank.), here is the current state of gear:

For all that complain about the one hits in the new map, check out the new gear first! These are my stats with full legendary 61 gear and a set of noble furies. First pic is with the Duskbringer Aegis, second with the Duskbringer Claymore (both with 2 awakenings).

[resurrected]

Armor difference is just too Insane !

[Arloriano]

+1

Congrats and thanks Ardbeg, always being helpful!

[Ardbeg]

Armor difference is just too Insane !

I have a 5% armor awakening on the aegis, but it was insane before. I just posted this to show, that it is easy and cheap to gear up for those that struggle now in the Graveyard.

[Zulgath]

And my rog with legend armor and helm r 3.5k armor and 2k pure dmg

[resurrected]

I have a 5% armor awakening on the aegis, but it was insane before. I just posted this to show, that it is easy and cheap to gear up for those that struggle now in the Graveyard.

Thanks for sharing and clarification seems very good move by STG

[Ardbeg]

Thanks for sharing and clarification seems very good move by STG

In fact, i bought the cheapest set of gear early on and used it without jewels while stalking and upgrading 61 gear. I could comfortably run even with lepre, egg ring and pure hisha without getting one hitted (armor around 5k). What got me most was the Krax course, lol. In any case, it is very affordable to run new maps with the new gear even on lowest tier.

[Ardbeg]

And my rog with legend armor and helm r 3.5k armor and 2k pure dmg

i would love to see max full legendary 61 rogue and mage stats. Could you provide a screenshot perhaps?

[intrepd]

i would love to see max full legendary 61 rogue and mage stats. Could you provide a screenshot perhaps?

Sorry but how come the armor difference is so high? in CS the shield has low armor.

[Zulgath]

Sorry but how come the armor difference is so high? in CS the shield has low armor.

Its the armor and helm for rog it adds like +1.5k armor from old legendaries

[VROOMIGoRealFast]

Sorry but how come the armor difference is so high? in CS the shield has low armor.

Ask Ardbeg to post the proc info for the Duskbringer Claymore

[intrepd]

Its the armor and helm for rog it adds like +1.5k armor from old legendaries

i quouted the wrong post sorry, i meant his screenshot for tank, how come its huge diff in armor

[Thewolfbull]

Nice man im just exited to see what the proc is on new mythic aegis hopefully better than 46 aegis (doubt it) but i can still hope lol.

[Ardbeg]

Ask Ardbeg to post the proc info for the Duskbringer Claymore

The pics were made without any procs or buffs active, other than the full tavern and location buff and the munch mouth happiness buffs. no elixier or pet buffs were involved.

The Aegis has the following Awakenings:
4% health,
5% armor

The Claymore has these:
2,5% str, dex, int
1,5% str

What Vroom is referring to is this:

The Claymore passively decreases armor by 30% and increases damage instead for 30%.

So you can have a beastly defense and offense weapon option on a budget.

[Ardbeg]

Nice man im just exited to see what the proc is on new mythic aegis hopefully better than 46 aegis (doubt it) but i can still hope lol.

The Aegis proc is:

Each basic attack increases players armor by 5%. Armor buff can stack twice. Charged attacks grant higher armor.

I am only at the beginning to test the weapons and we probably have to ask ravagerx for an in depth review.

But what i can already tell is this: The skill damage (example skyward smash) on the new aegis is around 700 higher than on my old aegis with one para. This is significant and could very well end the aera of the old aegis. But i have yet to test it in hard maps, as the old aegis proc would still dominate easy mobs.

[ilhanna]

The pics were made without any procs or buffs active, other than the full tavern and location buff and the munch mouth happiness buffs. no elixier or pet buffs were involved.

The Aegis has the following Awakenings:
4% health,
5% armor

The Claymore has these:
2,5% str, dex, int
1,5% str

What Vroom is referring to is this:

The Claymore passively decreases armor by 30% and increases damage instead for 30%.

So you can have a beastly defense and offense weapon option on a budget.

By passively decreasing armor and increasing damage, does the Claymore works something like Scorn's AA then, trading off armor for damage?

[Ardbeg]

By passively decreasing armor and increasing damage, does the Claymore works something like Scorn's AA then, trading off armor for damage?

Exactly, but to my current knowledge only to the bearer itself. It is a constant passive, not a proc.

[Ninthplague]

I just tested a lvl58 legendary aegis with magma aa in a group of mobs, old lvl46 mythic aegis with magma aa still kills mobs faster.

[Ardbeg]

I just tested a lvl58 legendary aegis with magma aa in a group of mobs, old lvl46 mythic aegis with magma aa still kills mobs faster.

I don t think we can judge now, as we don t have really hard mobs now. The new aegis is more designed for survivability and skill damage, while the old aegis only damages with the proc. As long as the mobs are impressed by the proc, the old aegis wins. But when i look at the crazy amount of armor we got, something tells me, mobs will not stay easy...

[Tippertwo]

People are becoming too op XD