I see lately that there are more "2010" players than when i joined in like 2011!
To get back on topic:
Cinco, I like the idea behind the +/- 2 pvp change, and when I first heard of it, I supported the idea a 100%. However, on most pvp levels, we really need all the players we can get to maintain a fun environment. I haven't really followed the discussions on the matter, but it would be great if it could be possibly determined at hosting whether a game should be +/- 2 or 5, however if this is not a possibility, then 5 would be the better standard solution. Since the change, even though we are trying to keep things alive on the player side (at least some of us) lvl 51-56 pvp (my home) is barren. Thanks for all the work you put into working with PL btw!
TLDR: +1 to +/-5
PL: iBest - No Longer, rest in peace you beautiful game!
I think the 5 level difference just encourages exploitation of the set differences between levels. Thus, I believe that 50+ should keep the level range of +/- 2 while all those levels below (because they don't have sets) should we switched back to the +/- 5 level differential. Yes, lower level PvP will be a bit harder, but it doesn't have the player base to sustain a +/- 2 level gap.
I disagree. Although some levels of pvp have died, it's much more balanced and I'm grateful for that. I'm sick of 25-27s teaming my 22
Want a forum signature? Go here! https://www.spacetimestudios.com/sho...o-s-Sig-Bazaar
Want a forum signature? Go here! https://www.spacetimestudios.com/sho...o-s-Sig-Bazaar
Want a forum signature? Go here! https://www.spacetimestudios.com/sho...o-s-Sig-Bazaar
Ya'll need endgame
I like the +/-2 for lvl 50+... But at the lower lvls it's kinda annoying
Ty Cinco
Want a forum signature? Go here! https://www.spacetimestudios.com/sho...o-s-Sig-Bazaar
Bookmarks