Originally Posted by
Rauitri
I thought this wasn't "English 101" ? Hey, at least mine was just a mispelled word, and not unorganized paragrahps with continuous sentences with no proper stops.
I replaced the racist to delusional, as that's a more appropiate word to use. I called you delusional, as you get blinded by the rich. You keep repeating youself with, "my proof of 35% is screenshots with rich people with endless/arcane eggs etc." That is considered delusional, as you're ignorant that can't accept that being rich doesn't always mean they've bought plat.
Lb using statistics isn't nonsense, but you being ignorant. Lb compares different categories, in those categories there are dividers. Example is Ursoth lb, it is a category with 4 dividers namely, Overall/Rog/Mage/Warr. How statistics work in this? Well, the system divides them in dividers and rankings, it is doing this with data collected. It is considered statistics as long as there is comparison, which the leaderboards has, you can actually put the leaderboards in a graph with parameters if you want to do it manually in Excel. (Basically, the lb is represented as a Statistical Model).
I examined your screenshots. I know most, and can tell you that the majority of players you've showed was infact not plat users, most were merchers/farmers, as those are who I farmed with everyday that gotten rich from it, you're wrong about this. Showing ample screenshots to prove a percentage estimation is inappropiate, because you don't have enough sample size to conclude your 35% claim.
I've been telling you that my 1% is a METAPHOR, why can't you get that? You're being ignorant again, and telling me to show proof/evidence, wherein metaphor statements can't be questioned as such. Metaphor isn't an actual truth, but an idea for viewers to know the situation without really giving much information.
The topic was removed as showing screenshots really showed poor, inacurate, inappropiate, unecessary results. I brought up a metaphor, and you started by giving screenshots that didn't prove anything.
No point further arguing that your 35% is a close estimation, as your sample size was like 50~100? Out of the tens and thousands of other players out there. How is that enough proof to conclude that Al players consist of 35% plat users?.
At the end, I was just proving you, hopefully you'd be convinced that the 3 screenshots you've shown really is a poor representation of the 35% plat users.
Why? Because small sample size, most were even merchers/farmers (not plat users), you assumed they used plat because they're rich etcc.
Sent from my SM-A800F using Tapatalk
Bookmarks