Let Mt. Fang stay longer this time!

**Swimmingstar** · 11-24-2011, 01:00 PM

I say 2 months is short but I think 3 months could be ok. 3 and a half months would be better even for holidays.

My plan to 66 is get 5k xp a day. That would take 20 days but there are holidays. But there could be the players who are super busy. They still want 66 but only average about 1k xp a day. Since 3 months is about 90 days I say there should be 3 and a half months break between next cap. Why and a half? Because there are many holidays like Thanksgiving and Christmas. People will probably go on a 2 day-2 week vacation for christmas and might not have time to play. Instead they probably will celebrate with their families and have fun on their vacation.

**RedRyder** · 11-24-2011, 03:30 PM

You can't accommodate everyone you know.

**XghostzX** · 11-24-2011, 03:45 PM

Originally Posted by Dalinuel

How about a year so we all can get tired of playing pocket legends and move on to something else?..you guys got to remember pocket legends is a buisness and a way to run a buisness is to keep things fresh...so I'm all for pl releasing new content every couple of months

Dalli-

If PL fans aren't happy, the devs can't possibly be in buisness. There is still lots of content that gets thrown out at us (I.e. Deal of the day). Also don't forget, there are players who are just downloading PL and currently spending money on platinum and in game purchases.

That being said, i think the amount of time for this campaign should be extended to february.

**Imacoolbirdd** · 11-24-2011, 03:58 PM

Hi.

**Cytokinesis** · 11-24-2011, 04:01 PM

Originally Posted by Imacoolbirdd

Hi.

bye.

**Swimmingstar** · 11-25-2011, 02:00 PM

Originally Posted by Imacoolbirdd

Hi.

Originally Posted by Cytokinesis

bye.

Off-topic?

**Prest87** · 11-25-2011, 03:38 PM

What if the devs decreased the amount of exp for non hard core lvls and increased exp needed for hardcore lvls?
This way say getting to 65 would b easier but getting to 66 could b just as tough

**Swimmingstar** · 11-25-2011, 06:35 PM

Originally Posted by Prest87

What if the devs decreased the amount of exp for non hard core lvls and increased exp needed for hardcore lvls?
This way say getting to 65 would b easier but getting to 66 could b just as tough

Or making the elite levels normally hard but making non elite easy.

**Rare** · 11-25-2011, 10:18 PM

Originally Posted by RedRyder

Sorry I didn't see your post as I was still writing dan's reply lol, but I think my response could pertain to you as well

PL was also my first MMORPG, so its near and dear to my heart and I try to see the reasoning in all of STS' decisions. In the end of the day, since day one, theyve always looked out for our best interests and try to accommodate us all as much as possible.

Oh I completely agree with you. I think STS has gone above and beyond when it comes to customer feedback and taking community suggestions. I've never really seen that type of response anywhere else.

Another thing to consider is the "competition" between PL and SL. Its difficult enough to keep up with just PL. Add in SL and its a whole different beast. Me personally, I haven't played SL since Nuri's was released as I find PL has far superior entertainment value.

**Rare** · 11-25-2011, 10:21 PM

Originally Posted by Tamino

Milking a cow four times a day doesn't double the milk, but surely annoys the cow...

Dude. That is an awesome analogy. lol

**Storms** · 11-26-2011, 02:34 AM

I hope the next one really knocks our socks off.
Starlegends looks amazing,No rehashing over there!

**Bunnyshoota** · 11-26-2011, 10:51 AM

Well, maybe not three and a half months. If there is a new campaign every 3 months exactly, then there will be 4 new ones each year. That's what I'm thinking.