Who agree pet no need to feed

[stevanusx]

i think no one feed pet.they just change pet when hungry.maybe someone must fix this.

[elbowroom]

ok then

[Paar]

RIOT!

[Jessicazx]

Even though it seems like a good idea, i disagree. People would hog onto overpowered pets like malison and hammerjaw and continously use them making them dominated over the less rich players. If there is a feeding system, they will have a limit to their usage and if they wish to extend it, they will have to pay gold to feed them.

[Lesmiserables]

Den do as you say , just rotate dont feed .

[Ghostlytwink]

Incorrect I have never changed my pet in fact I only have 1 lvl 25 pet rest are lvl 1

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

[Athenum]

I agree that it is possible not to feed your pets. If you have enough, you can simply cycle through them. Jessicazx is right. without pet bars going down, it would be unfair for other less fortunate players since you can just keep using your "wonderpets" as much as you want.

Feeding them provides a balance. Especially their food becomes more expensive as they level up, it becomes troublesome buying food and pots as you continue playing. Besides, other than losing their bonus and not picking up loot. unhappy pets still attack enemies so they aren't worthless.

I still stand by my original suggestion that i posted on this thread.

It would be interesting to see pets attack their masters if left unfed after a certain period of time. It would surely keep rich players feeding them (if they don't want to swap their pets out.)

[Fefferi]

ookaaay? o.O

[wrathstorm]

Feeding pets is a good idea because it will automatically encouraging players to do alot of farming and saving.

[Valsacar]

I think... I haven't bothered caring, auto-feed it's cheap. I just wish auto-feed was faster, if they go hungry during a fight you lose them until everything is dead.

[Darthmase]

I think pets happiness meter should refill when they level up. I also think the meter should last longer in ratio to how high their level is.

[wrathstorm]

I think pets happiness meter should refill when they level up. I also think the meter should last longer in ratio to how high their level is.

Agreed. That would be nice if STS do this

[Ohemgee]

Pet no need feed. Yes.

[Jessicazx]

I like things the way they are right now. No more complications...

[Valsacar]

If we're giving our wants... new abilities for pets past 15 would be nice.

[Fyrce]

i think no one feed pet.they just change pet when hungry.maybe someone must fix this.

Not true. Watch your group -- most people do not switch pets, therefore they must be feeding them or you would see a lot more unhappy pets.

[McBain]

I usually switch mine when there's a break in the action a little before the happiness meter actually gets all the way down. This is to avoid the meter running out in the middle of a fight out, as someone else mentioned.

[stevanusx]

Yep its fine u can use one pet only doesnt matter.still no bother u to feed when u fight.whats the point for feeding.

[lovestriker]

Even though it seems like a good idea, i disagree. People would hog onto overpowered pets like malison and hammerjaw and continously use them making them dominated over the less rich players. If there is a feeding system, they will have a limit to their usage and if they wish to extend it, they will have to pay gold to feed them.

This. Some pets give really high bonuses. It would be unfair for those who have no such pets.

[stevanusx]

So howmany agree n howmany disagree?