Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 43 of 43

Thread: AL better than PL??

  1. #41
    Senior Member Rawrimafish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Stalk Much?
    Posts
    1,514
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    229
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    51
    Thanked in
    45 Posts

    Default

    No, PL is the original, AL is just a mix between PL and DL (maybe SL)

  2. #42
    Senior Member Back's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,092
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    89
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    145
    Thanked in
    85 Posts

    Default

    My mage "Wall" and Rogue "Plastic" are 16 already and warrior "Back" is 15.

    So far, the game is much much addicting than PL with better play styles and atleast I can see variation in PvP builds unlike PL.

    Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk 2

  3. #43
    Forum Adept PvP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alterra
    Posts
    432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Default

    I played AL for the first 6 months of its release, one of the starter archers when it released. AL sparked the interest I had for that game again, and it seems much more refined. One of the biggest problems we had was repetition and boredom at cap... That won't be happening here so much.

    Level 45 Archer - Pex
    Among the first archers on Pocket Legends.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •