Quote Originally Posted by MightyMicah View Post
Hmm. I still don't get it. It seems to me that this accounting system is full-proof. It's merely the exchanging of assets on both sides, and the gaining of liability on both sides. Granted, the liabilities are not "programmed" into the game but due to the fact that the initial trade is voluntary, and that the assets and liability are all of equal value, I see no harm. Any scamming or other such issues which might arise could only cause as much harm as they would without this system. Like I said, I see nothing wrong with this idea. Am I missing something?
I think what could go wrong isn't with the trade they both agree on, but with the "gentleman's agreement" about what happens after that trade, and who should have to sort through disagreements.