Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 360

  Click here to go to the first Dev post in this thread.   Thread: Cupid's Clash! A Level 15 Twink TDM Tournament | Discussion Thread

  1. #181
    Senior Member Appeltjes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,199
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    186
    Thanked in
    138 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravager View Post
    But what's your suggestion?
    Nothing to be suggested except for allowing 14 for some more mages.

  2. #182
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    244
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    74
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Default

    Lol is sts even reading this? Doesnt saw a post of them so far.

  3. #183
    Member DiddyMakeit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    51
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Default

    I agree the lack of mages is an issue.
    it should be changed to allow a 3 man team with a 1 warrior max. That may boost the sign up sheet.
    it may also quiet the complaining of arcane pets. Seeing that most of the twinks that have arcane are either warriors or rogues.

    If this tournament goes to a 1 arcane per team, I move to allow only 3 paras per team.

  4. #184
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,177
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    117
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,249
    Thanked in
    446 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danisafi View Post
    Maybe deactivate para gem DMG add
    For some people, that's their only gear so they can't swap out the gear. Not even sure if disabling it is possible. And if it was, they would just have an empty slot?

    Quote Originally Posted by Appeltjes View Post
    Nothing to be suggested except for allowing 14 for some more mages.
    I don't think it'd be an issue to allow 14 mages into a 15 tourney but they'd probably have a huge disadvantage.

  5. #185
    Member ~Venus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    59
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DiddyMakeit View Post
    I agree the lack of mages is an issue.
    it should be changed to allow a 3 man team with a 1 warrior max. That may boost the sign up sheet.
    it may also quiet the complaining of arcane pets. Seeing that most of the twinks that have arcane are either warriors or rogues.

    If this tournament goes to a 1 arcane per team, I move to allow only 3 paras per team.
    paras? gears with paras costs 1-2mil only. Youre comparing 10-35mil pets to 2-5mil gears? LOL

  6. #186
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    244
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    74
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Default

    The best thing would be if all had equal gear and pet...just need skill>gear but how sadly it is atm its gear over skill

  7. #187
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    273
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Default

    [quote name=&quot;DiddyMakeit&quot; post=2045451]I agree the lack of mages is an issue.<br />
    it should be changed to allow a 3 man team with a 1 warrior max. That may boost the sign up sheet.<br />
    it may also quiet the complaining of arcane pets. Seeing that most of the twinks that have arcane are either warriors or rogues.<br />
    <br />
    If this tournament goes to a 1 arcane per team, I move to allow only 3 paras per team.[/QUOTE]<br />
    <br />
    paras? gears with paras costs 1-2mil only. Youre comparing 10-35mil pets to 2-5mil gears? LOL<br/> There are people using an amount of para gems and eyes which easily costs 10m even some rings with para gems cost 8.5m ( ensorcelled / legend braid ).


    To Ravager:
    So what about just taking the DMG % + of the para gems and only leave the 2,0 basic gem DMG?

  8. #188
    Member DiddyMakeit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    51
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Default

    I'm not comparing costs.

    I'm comparing the disadvantages teams may face in a tournament that takes away their arcane pets vs rogues with 10 paras and a dova

  9. #189
    Senior Member toxorto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    968
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    54
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    65
    Thanked in
    46 Posts

    Default

    Seriously 208 posts in this thread and 5 of them are made of teams who want to participate. Can't you guys make a thread on the feedback section to discuss?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to toxorto For This Useful Post:


  11. #190
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    273
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Default

    Made. But i guess none of them will care ^^

  12. #191
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,177
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    117
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,249
    Thanked in
    446 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danisafi View Post
    [quote name="DiddyMakeit" post=2045451]I agree the lack of mages is an issue.<br />
    it should be changed to allow a 3 man team with a 1 warrior max. That may boost the sign up sheet.<br />
    it may also quiet the complaining of arcane pets. Seeing that most of the twinks that have arcane are either warriors or rogues.<br />
    <br />
    If this tournament goes to a 1 arcane per team, I move to allow only 3 paras per team.
    <br />
    <br />
    paras? gears with paras costs 1-2mil only. Youre comparing 10-35mil pets to 2-5mil gears? LOL<br/> There are people using an amount of para gems and eyes which easily costs 10m even some rings with para gems cost 8.5m ( ensorcelled / legend braid ).


    To Ravager:
    So what about just taking the DMG % + of the para gems and only leave the 2,0 basic gem DMG?[/QUOTE]

    Sure. That would be a suggestion but would it be possible? Altering the game state and going through all that source code just for one tournament. Most likely they would consider that too much of a hassle.

  13. #192
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    273
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Default

    I'm not informed about programming and so on , so i can't say anything to this .
    It would be nice to get a reply to some posted ideas , so if any def reads this , just spend a bit of your time to answer some of the questions , thank you

  14. #193
    Member DiddyMakeit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    51
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Default

    I think allowing 3 man teams with a 1 warrior limit would fix alot of the issues ppl have with the tournament setup.

    No other changes would need to be made.

  15. #194
    Member DiddyMakeit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    51
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Default

    Ok so back to topic..

    3 man 1 warrior limit lineup works well with everyone?

    Ok great. Let's forget all of this 1 arcane per team nonsence and encourage more twinks to sign up. =)

  16. #195
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,177
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    117
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,249
    Thanked in
    446 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DiddyMakeit:2045677
    Ok so back to topic..

    3 man 1 warrior limit lineup works well with everyone?

    Ok great. Let's forget all of this 1 arcane per team nonsence and encourage more twinks to sign up. =)
    Thats a good suggestion and I see where you're getting. The only problem I can think of is that the mages that are on current teams may be dropped for rogues unless they have arcane pets. But then again, what solution doesnt have problems. Itll feel like planar tombs.

    The arcane pet thing may not seem like an issue or as big as a deterrent now but if the mages in the current signups are replaced with arcane pet rogues, it may be?

    Just voicing my opinion.
    Last edited by Ravager; 02-10-2015 at 06:26 PM.

  17. #196
    Banned Jhawkeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    2,866
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    72
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    147
    Thanked in
    84 Posts

    Default

    Who will win in this fierce competition? The mighty Zeus, or The awesome Conrad. Both are well prepped for their battle, which will come out on top. Stay tuned, for the next Dragon Ball Z!

  18. #197
    Senior Member siddhant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    ctf ,forums
    Posts
    1,076
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    164
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    68
    Thanked in
    62 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danisafi View Post
    I may used the wrong words for the things i wanted to say .
    But , did any Twink take part at lv41 tournament ? NO .
    Going with this i dont have anything against it if a endgamer twinks ( i do so too).
    But i am not getting okay with your wish to forbid More then 1 arcane pet , those who owned them didnt open Them for NOT BEING ALLOWED to use them .So i say it more specific : I'm okay with Endgamers who want to participate at this event but I'm not okay with their wish to lower the amount of arcane pets .
    I may got some haters with what i say but you can ask half of the twinks , the are of the same opinion .
    Thanks
    No most twinks would be more happy without arcane pets even when i asked chamqion (former gm of champions league)he said he doesnt have any arcane pet so he wont take part and i dont think any of team including karma and phoenix(with the pets they currently using) would be able to defeat ints team so forget abt the normal twinks.

    siddhantsingh<turbo>(lvl41mage)
    lukepvp(retired)(lvl25tank)
    sidpvp<nvm>(lvl15mage)

  19. #198
    Forum Adept Franocazzzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Posts
    373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    10
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    13
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Default

    Remien I posted my teams line up and I don't see the post now

  20. #199
    Forum Adept Franocazzzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Posts
    373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    10
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    13
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Default

    Nvm found it

  21.   Click here to go to the next Dev post in this thread.   #200
    Moderator - Inactive Seoratrek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    The Rainy City
    Posts
    1,896
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    14
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,230
    Thanked in
    460 Posts

    Default

    From the sign up thread:

    Quote Originally Posted by Seoratrek View Post
    Hey everyone!

    As suggested by a few of you, I started a discussion thread (and moved your posts) about this event here: http://www.spacetimestudios.com/show...cussion-Thread

    As always, remember to keep the discussion civil. Thanks!
    | | | |

    Need help? Please visit our Support Website at http://support.spacetimestudios.com

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 60
    Last Post: 02-17-2015, 05:15 PM
  2. 3v3 CTF Clash - A Level 61 Tournament
    By XghostzX in forum PL Player vs. Player
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 09-16-2014, 11:22 AM
  3. Summer Clash 3v3 TDM Tournament
    By Hue in forum AL Player vs. Player
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-05-2014, 09:14 PM
  4. Level 77 Ancient Caverns Update Discussion and Bugs Thread!
    By Whirlzap in forum PL General Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 08-05-2014, 10:25 PM
  5. Level 10 Twink PvP Tournament
    By GodzSoldier in forum AL General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-17-2013, 06:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •