The ULTIMATE PvP Class Guide, ALL SPECS AND ALL CLASSES COVERED.

[RedRyder]

Pvp on this game is deffective and needs work. You guys are going way too in depth for an iPod game

[Justg]

Pvp on this game is deffective and needs work. You guys are going way too in depth for an iPod game

1) It has been out for all of 12 hours. Safe to say we'll be tweaking it.
2) Distinct your efforts are MUCH appreciated and very helpful for our tweaks.

[Distinct]

1) It has been out for all of 12 hours. Safe to say we'll be tweaking it.
2) Distinct your efforts are MUCH appreciated and very helpful for our tweaks.

1: Like I said in another post a few minutes ago, when 1.1 came out, there were a few bugs. Then you and the rest of the team went on a patching spree, and within a day or two the game was bugfree and better than ever before.

2: I was mostly doing it for me and other fellow PvP'ers, but it's great that you can use it to your advantage when ballancing the PvP system further.

[RedRyder]

1) It has been out for all of 12 hours. Safe to say we'll be tweaking it.
2) Distinct your efforts are MUCH appreciated and very helpful for our tweaks.

As it may not be the best I know you guys will change that.
I have no doubt in you guys whatsover

[Azrael]

Distinct. Alot of what you noted here is accurate, some of it is not.

The Int mage with some dex or str is not as weak as you claim. 1v1 they are at a disadvantage, but if you do a pure nuke build, they can compete with archers. I respeced my mage with 111 int and 75 dex, with every damage spell (5 frostbite and 1 icstorm, 5 fire 5 lightning 5 drainlife) and did suprising well. with magic shield, drainlife and heal i was very hard to kill at times, and did solid damage. The debuff/buff/heal mages are support and greatly improve a party, but alone they dont do as well.

My tests with 2h vs trident shield warrior were different than yours. Done properly they are nearly even, but the advantage is on the 2h warriors side. I did 6 fights with rannos. With 2h he won 3 and i won 2 with trident (the last one i got distracted by vent and he killed me, but i didnt could it cause i didn't use buffs for awhile). As for group combat, the shield warrior does much less burst damage than the 2h warrior, but has a very high survivability. The 2h warrior has less survivability, but enough to not die if a healer is in his group. However the 2h warrior does the best burst damage, along with bow archers when they throw out all their skills.

Bowbears are very good, and overall better than archers, but the don't have as much burst damage due to their skills being melee.

Edit: i have to edit to state this again. 2h bears are the last thing you want to face against a organized group, and are imho better than 1h. 1h bears dont have the burst damage to drop their enemies in the same way. They just last forever, but we just end up ignoring them and targeting the archers and Enchantressess

[Distinct]

Distinct. Alot of what you noted here is accurate, some of it is not.

The Int mage with some dex or str is not as weak as you claim. 1v1 they are at a disadvantage, but if you do a pure nuke build, they can compete with archers. I respeced my mage with 111 int and 75 dex, with every damage spell (5 frostbite and 1 icstorm, 5 fire 5 lightning 5 drainlife) and did suprising well. with magic shield, drainlife and heal i was very hard to kill at times, and did solid damage. The debuff/buff/heal mages are support and greatly improve a party, but alone they dont do as well.

I'm sorry, but I completely disagree.

They will not stand a chance against an Archer, let alone be able to compete with them.

Like I said, I did my tests well.
And like I also said, ANYONE is free to challenge my Archer with your Enchantress.
This includes you. I actually think it'd help me prove my point.

Normal PvP has a Rock-Paper-Scissor thing going on.

So far here we have:
Warriors > Archers > Enchantress's