We should have more forum ranks besides Junior Member, Member, and Senior Member.
1-100=Junior Member
100-200=Member
200-300=Experienced Member
300-400=Expert Member
400-500=Senior Member
We should have more forum ranks besides Junior Member, Member, and Senior Member.
1-100=Junior Member
100-200=Member
200-300=Experienced Member
300-400=Expert Member
400-500=Senior Member
Not to be rude or mean, but why try to "fix something that isn't broken"?
Esus-Archer|Glyph-Warrior|Kangol- Paladin (Enchantress)
o dont care much for the idea, most people would just post heaps of spam comments (not saying people dont already do that) haha
I prefer monster levels, or perhaps:
Loud Like Lint
Pocket Whisperer
I Have things to Say
Thumbs of Lightning
Legendary Opiniongiver
Malaclypse/Enchantress*Spudboy/Archer*Slackerbob/Paladin?
Fnordian refugee
LOL Spud, that's funny.
♪♫♬signature by Rebel♬♫♪
Lol, if it changes, spud's rank names 4tw. Otherwise...who pays much attention? :/
Proud Forum Guild member.
Mobdropper - 35 Mage
Berigut - 35 Dex Bear
Archang - 35 Dex Mage
Our ranking system is global, keep it the way it is. Original. No need for more reasons to spam.
i'm only ok with this if i'm able to delete silly threads like this one with the highest rank
Ogrim-lvl 50-Ursan Alta-lvl 45-Enchantress Broke-lvl 45-Avian
Venom Website: http://venom.forumn.net
I am just comparing situations.
I'm saying the catchphrase of "if it aint broke dont fix it" just promotes stagnation. People rest on their laurels and never improve their products and eventually get left behind. It cannot be applied to all situations.
There is no harm in changing the forum ranks. Its a purely cosmetic thing.
☺/ oh hai~!
/▌
.║
IGN: Igglebob , Moondrake
Bookmarks