Results 1 to 20 of 83

  Click here to go to the first Dev post in this thread.   Thread: Bring Back 5 Level PvP Difference

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Banned Kurvy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    PVP
    Posts
    512
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    230
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    71
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buchmeister View Post
    I disagree. Although some levels of pvp have died, it's much more balanced and I'm
    grateful for that. I'm sick of 25-27s teaming my 22
    The low lvl pvp levels are random, unlike 51,61,66,71. there is alot of different levels.

  2. #2
    Blogger Buchmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Turn around
    Posts
    789
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    271
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurvy View Post
    The low lvl pvp levels are random, unlike 51,61,66,71. there is alot of different levels.
    Yes but more opportunity to overtake your opponent with better sets from more recent caps. 51-71 join level should especially be kept to 2.

  3. #3
    Banned Kurvy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    PVP
    Posts
    512
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    230
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    71
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buchmeister View Post
    Yes but more opportunity to overtake your opponent with better sets from more recent caps. 51-71 join level should especially be kept to 2.
    But everything below it should be -+5

  4. #4
    Blogger Buchmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Turn around
    Posts
    789
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    271
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurvy View Post
    But everything below it should be -+5
    Not necessarily. It's just that the higher levels have more reason to be kept at a 2 lvl range.

  5. #5
    Banned Kurvy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    PVP
    Posts
    512
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    230
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    71
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buchmeister View Post
    Not necessarily. It's just that the higher levels have more reason to be kept at a 2 lvl range.
    I now see most levels dead. Which i didnt see when it was +/-5, even if it means "set exploitation", its still better to have a full pvp game then none. No one said you have to stick around to get farmed by a higher level.

  6. #6
    Banned Kurvy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    PVP
    Posts
    512
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    230
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    71
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buchmeister View Post
    Not necessarily. It's just that the higher levels have more reason to be kept at a 2 lvl range.
    All pvp levels have suffered from this. Even if there is still games for 20-25, that level has stilled lost players. And ik 100 percent sure there was more games when it was 5. I think if it came down to it. You would choose the 5 level difference.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Congeniality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Taco Legends
    Posts
    704
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    529
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    186 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buchmeister View Post
    Yes but more opportunity to overtake your opponent with better sets from more recent caps. 51-71 join level should especially be kept to 2.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurvy View Post
    But everything below it should be -+5
    Read my post above ^^^^^^

  8. #8
    Blogger Buchmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Turn around
    Posts
    789
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    271
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Congeniality View Post
    Read my post above ^^^^^^
    I have yet to find a lack of 20-25 games. Tbh to me (especially 66) higher lvl has less players. Idk why people complain that they can't find games.

  9. #9
    Banned Kurvy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    PVP
    Posts
    512
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    230
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    71
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buchmeister View Post
    I have yet to find a lack of 20-25 games. Tbh to me (especially 66) higher lvl has less players. Idk why people complain that they can't find games.
    Because we cant find games...
    This wouldnt be a thread if we could.

  10. #10
    Blogger Buchmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Turn around
    Posts
    789
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    271
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurvy View Post
    Because we cant find games...
    This wouldnt be a thread if we could.
    You must be on at the wrong time, because I don't have issues with that.
    Last edited by Buchmeister; 03-23-2017 at 07:57 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. what's the max level difference you can have on 1v1 DM?
    By Zeezbrah in forum PL Player vs. Player
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-26-2012, 01:46 PM
  2. bring back the elit level item set
    By skrapicoco in forum PL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-04-2012, 10:04 AM
  3. suggestion to bring life back to nuri's and level 65 players
    By wvhills in forum PL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-23-2012, 01:59 PM
  4. Bring back 2000 plat purchase option before new level cap comes out!
    By UTHRA in forum PL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-13-2012, 05:16 PM
  5. Replies: 180
    Last Post: 01-14-2011, 07:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •