Add new " VOTE KICK SYSTEM " in PVP

[HopeSolo]

Hi all, this is my sillyidea and i don't know you guys whether like it or not, i would love to share it to you all. I've played some shooting game such as Counter strike, Crossfire, Modern warfare series, COD series... They had an option that it is called " kick" which mean one of players was kicked by others in same team.
HERE IS HOW IT WORKS:
A battle,which has both sides( red and blue), limits 10-12 players.
Each person in team has 2 vote times to kick others in theirs team.
His/ her requests must be approved by the votes of both sides and if the votes are majority then that person will be kicked out of the room. For instance, we have a game in pvp and one of my team is AFK in room and i try to kick that person out of the room. if she/he has more than 6 out of 10 votes are approved by teams, that person will be kicked. In addition, people, who was kicked, can't join back the room within 20 minutes
Well, This is just my own idea and My point is that i would like to ask STS that if they can add it in pvp, so our games will be great. On the other hand, I don't know what they are doing there because i saw some people are just sitting in room and others are AFK. I just want to make more spaces for those who are waiting in the lobby and willing to play in pvp. So we can enjoy a great game and have fun together. Leave your comment below about what you think and thanks for your times

[Instanthumor]

+1!

But unfortunately, this solution doesn't get rid of those nasty spotblockers.

[nyknicks]

I agree completely I hate spot blockers and how they don't leave game

[Endkey]

Instead of that all the people vote...the team with the guy they wanna kick should vote....if all vote then block spoters remain...howrver if the team votes then we can easily remove the block spoter or the afk guy :)

[Solid]

Hi all, this is my sillyidea and i don't know you guys whether like it or not, i would love to share it to you all. I've played some shooting game such as Counter strike, Crossfire, Modern warfare series, COD series... They had an option that it is called " kick" which mean one of players was kicked by others in same team.
HERE IS HOW IT WORKS:
A battle,which has both sides( red and blue), limits 10-12 players.
Each person in team has 2 vote times to kick others in theirs team.
His/ her requests must be approved by the votes of both sides and if the votes are majority then that person will be kicked out of the room. For instance, we have a game in pvp and one of my team is AFK in room and i try to kick that person out of the room. if she/he has more than 6 out of 10 votes are approved by teams, that person will be kicked.
Well, This is just my own idea and My point is that i would like to ask STS that if they can add it in pvp, so our games will be great. On the other hand, I don't know what they are doing there because i saw some people are just sitting in room and others are AFK. I just want to make more spaces for those who are waiting in the lobby and willing to play in pvp. So we can enjoy a great game and have fun together. Leave your comment below about what you think and thanks for your times

Those games are FPSs and the kick system was implemented to rid the game of hackers and cheaters.

[Instanthumor]

Instead of that all the people vote...the team with the guy they wanna kick should vote....if all vote then block spoters remain...howrver if the team votes then we can easily remove the block spoter or the afk guy :)

:applause:
This actually solves the problem for spotblockers! Go make a new thread!

[becky_xil]

Kick the flagggerrrr !!! :(

Send using my cellphone.. yes my cellphone

[Robhawk]

I know this system from Quake2 mods. I can tell you it didnt work as expected, because the votes often were against the best players, not the afk`s... An important difference between FPS like Q2 and AL is the fact, that there is no gear-differences!!! All play with same equipment without spending money/plat/gold or what ever... So what seperates players/teams from each other was: SKILL/aiming/movement/tactics/knowledge/strategies/teamplay and timing (f.e.Quad respawn).
So in a FPS nobody goes green with envy because of arcane maul or samael pets as players do in AL and even without the gear envy it didnt work... So the idea is good but wont work imho.

[Solid]

I know this system from Quake2 mods. I can tell you it didnt work as expected, because the votes often were against the best players, not the afk`s... An important difference between FPS like Q2 and AL is the fact, that there is no gear-differences!!! All play with same equipment without spending money/plat/gold or what ever... So what seperates players/teams from each other was: SKILL/aiming/movement/tactics/knowledge/strategies/teamplay and timing (f.e.Quad respawn).
So in a FPS nobody goes green with envy because of arcane maul or samael pets as players do in AL and even without the gear envy it didnt work... So the idea is good but wont work imho.


This is a prime example of why a "Boot" system will not be implemented into AL.

[Joncheese]

So make it a team that has to be created by a captain. Problem solved.

[HopeSolo]

I know this system from Quake2 mods. I can tell you it didnt work as expected, because the votes often were against the best players, not the afk`s... An important difference between FPS like Q2 and AL is the fact, that there is no gear-differences!!! All play with same equipment without spending money/plat/gold or what ever... So what seperates players/teams from each other was: SKILL/aiming/movement/tactics/knowledge/strategies/teamplay and timing (f.e.Quad respawn).
So in a FPS nobody goes green with envy because of arcane maul or samael pets as players do in AL and even without the gear envy it didnt work... So the idea is good but wont work imho.

I disagree with u in this sectentce "that there is no gear-differences!!! All play with same equipment without spending money/plat/gold or what ever" NOT all FPS games. ive played CROSSFIRE( Google it )it likes Counter Strikes, if you want to be a pro player, first, you have better skills or techniques obviosuly . Second, you must have a good better gears and weapons. Where do you get them? it is in the market and crates. You have to spend your own money to get better gears and good weapons or spin crates, because most good items are purchased by ZP(real money) They are similar like AL (ZP=platium=money) and (GP= coin= you can earn it in the game). You can find and buy ZP card at Walwart, 7-11, and mostly everywhere..

[Robhawk]

I disagree with u in this sectentce "that there is no gear-differences!!! All play with same equipment without spending money/plat/gold or what ever" NOT all FPS games. ive played CROSSFIRE( Google it )it likes Counter Strikes, if you want to be a pro player, first, you have better skills or techniques obviosuly . Second, you must have a good better gears and weapons. Where do you get them? it is in the market and crates. You have to spend your own money to get better gears and good weapons or spin crates, because most good items are purchased by ZP(real money) They are similar like AL (ZP=platium=money) and (GP= coin= you can earn it in the game). You can find and buy ZP card at Walwart, 7-11, and mostly everywhere..

I have to say all serious FPS beginning with Duke Nukem, the legendary Quake-series, Unreal Tournament, Counterstrike, Battlefield (you can/have to unlock items but you dont need to pay) and many more could be played without the "purchase items", "buy plats"...

So i just want to point out, that even without envy of other people`s money/plat/gear this system did not work so why should this work when money/gear differences / rich/poor is involved?

edit: THe biggest difference between today and years ago: You bought Quake2 and played it! You get better if you train hard... nothing more. The game producer just earned money with selling the game!
How is it today? You get most games FOR FREE BUT !!! if you want to be good you need this and that and if you spend money you dont need 3 month, just pay and you get it now... over time the rich will be the best and not the players of great talent! You need an example? You are the best AL-warrior skillwise but you are poor and can only afford Tarlok gear and a legendary pet... You play pvp 1on1 vs a rich, mean skilled full myth warrior with arcane maul or glaive with Samael pet. Who will win this? Everybody knows this... So your system cant work...
Today the purchasing system is aligned to get your money slooooowwwwllyyyy one by another with the consequence that many players spend MUCH MORE money over time than the would with just buying the game ! The producers like STS earn A LOT MORE MONEY with that system than selling the game for a fixed price!

This purchasing system is just a damn smart trap! "Come in for free, you dont need to pay - ENJOOYYY" If you do step in you get cursed... some more... some less... I bet there are players that spend thousands of dollars in only some month but hey this is just a game! But dont get me wrong i also spend money here but all in all im around 100$ in a year!

At the end of the there is material envy envolved so a kick system, which ever you want, will NOT work!

[Jig]

Whoever goes Afk for longer then 5-10 minutes in ANY PvE/PvP game, should be kicked for inactivity.

[inkredible]

So make it a team that has to be created by a captain. Problem solved.

+1 ^

better than boot system.
limited to 2-3 minutes to join

[Covert]

nice there should be a kick from town button too

[Jig]

nice there should be a kick from town button too

Why from town? Id rather a automatic kick from Pve Pvp games not in towns

[Farhazard]

So make it a team that has to be created by a captain. Problem solved.
So...,if we join a pvp room,we will be a captain?and we invite who to join?mmm...great...maybe a new pvp room called Captain vs Captain match,in this room we cant get blocked in a guild war ;)

[Ravager]

So make it a team that has to be created by a captain. Problem solved.

Unfortanately, this will help farmers to create their own rooms. Bad.

[Instanthumor]

I'd be happy if we could make parties of five players...

[Jig]

It's called hosting a game, you can kick boot lock the game and do whatever you want, it allows MORE trolls and booting, I'd say no to that

[Topchar]

VOTE KICK SYSTEM in PvP? lmao, you want farm dummy ??
if you see someone ---AFK--- , just go find another room.

[Castellann]

+1 good idea

[Madnex]

This isn't a very bad idea at all.

A vote-kick system was going to be implemented in AL in the first place but wasn't, if I recall correctly. Originally that would be to kick out the AFK players if they took too long in their inventory. Thus the little red X mark appears on the left of the name. Just a BUSY indication would be enough, if you think about it.


Allow kicking by democratic vote, at least for a week. They can already lock rooms by joining as guilds and farming each other's alts. With flagging on CTF, it's become a common silent agreement; "I'll let you flag if you let me flag".

A very good solution that has worked in other MMO's is to nullify any KD ratio changes from locked rooms. This way anyone can meet up and 1v1 or 2v2 with their friends without having to worry if someone else butts in and spoils the fun.

+1

[Jig]

This isn't a very bad idea at all.

A vote-kick system was going to be implemented in AL in the first place but wasn't, if I recall correctly. Originally that would be to kick out the AFK players if they took too long in their inventory. Thus the little red X mark appears on the left of the name. Just a BUSY indication would be enough, if you think about it.


Allow kicking by democratic vote, at least for a week. They can already lock rooms by joining as guilds and farming each other's alts. With flagging on CTF, it's become a common silent agreement; "I'll let you flag if you let me flag".

A very good solution that has worked in other MMO's is to nullify any KD ratio changes from locked rooms. This way anyone can meet up and 1v1 or 2v2 with their friends without having to worry if someone else butts in and spoils the fun.

+1
So many reasons WHY they shouldn't and shouldn't make the kick system, its in Pocket legends and Star Legends, it seems pretty fine to me, but al is a different game, it's structured much differently, and with THE AMOUNT of boosters? Plus this flagging crap StS made due to making (10k) flag achievement and all the rest, I think the boosters will use this kick system as a strategy, heck it will make MORE players boost and make a lot more angrier customers.

Just like in the please stop them thread, many many angry players already complaining about these boosters, so don't feed them, unless take away these achievements that encourage boosters to do so.

[Madnex]

Read. The. Full. Post.


And it wouldn't hurt to try. As of this moment, I'm not aware of any major issues that could be solved with implementing it but I also can't see anything bad if the last aspect of my suggestion is also applied.

There's no reason to panic like I'm suggesting to open Aeolus' bag of winds. The PvP is already in a poor shape and the farming methods are known and in full use. It's not a matter of if it speeds up things a little for those who want to farm flags or whatever, because they've already been doing it and will continue to do so. Which it won't.

[Ravager]

I know this system from Quake2 mods. I can tell you it didnt work as expected, because the votes often were against the best players, not the afk`s... An important difference between FPS like Q2 and AL is the fact, that there is no gear-differences!!! All play with same equipment without spending money/plat/gold or what ever... So what seperates players/teams from each other was: SKILL/aiming/movement/tactics/knowledge/strategies/teamplay and timing (f.e.Quad respawn).
So in a FPS nobody goes green with envy because of arcane maul or samael pets as players do in AL and even without the gear envy it didnt work... So the idea is good but wont work imho.

Again. This will be a problem as well.

[Ocareiav]

Meow

[Jsuit]

what i say is...



No one should be able to vote, i think


if in a pvp room, you haven't re-spawned/moved for... idk 5 min or so you should just auto get kicked, for spot blockers... ummm...


maybe get kicked if no fighting/deaths or kills have happened?


Thats what i think should happen............................................ ....................................

[Jig]

what i say is...



No one should be able to vote, i think


if in a pvp room, you haven't re-spawned/moved for... idk 5 min or so you should just auto get kicked, for spot blockers... ummm...


maybe get kicked if no fighting/deaths or kills have happened?


Thats what i think should happen............................................ ....................................

So if someone doesnt make a kill within 5 minutes they get kicked? yeah no thanks that is still bad on many reasons..

[Slardz]

This will be good, and you can kick somebody if you have an guildwar on pvp. No Blocks. Fair FIGHTS♥

Ladypebbles Sent this message using Phone ♥

[Jig]

This will be good, and you can kick somebody if you have an guildwar on pvp. No Blocks. Fair FIGHTS♥

Ladypebbles Sent this message using Phone ♥

Ladypebbles....? Thren?

[HopeSolo]

yeah I hope so... because everyone really expects to have fun, enjoy, and have a fair match for all without holding spots in pvp :)