View Full Version : The work paragems in ring
heisenberg
11-09-2014, 06:08 AM
1 ss show normal stats
2 ss show the difference stats
3 ss show the real diferrence +50dmg +50dps...
4 ss show i use other paragem in kersal..idk this work
heisenberg
11-09-2014, 06:56 AM
the cuestion is..put other paragem in my kersal? add me 25more dmg..lol?
Froxanthar
11-09-2014, 07:32 AM
OmG.. 4 para = +60??
heisenberg
11-09-2014, 08:32 AM
OmG.. 4 para = +60??
u can see the stats..is krazy no? nad no is +60 is +77dmg...idk this is hard ...
Raselph
11-09-2014, 08:38 AM
u can see the stats..is krazy no? nad no is +60 is +77dmg...idk this is hard ...
it is also because of your 402% dmg which is rather 400%+ which is bonus DMG
in case of what happened to you , your bonus dmg added in more dmg when u equipped it
heisenberg
11-09-2014, 04:25 PM
it is also because of your 402% dmg which is rather 400%+ which is bonus
in case of what happened to you , your bonus dmg added in more dmg when u equipped it
idk....
Raselph
11-09-2014, 05:03 PM
idk....
lets make it simple...
ur 400%+ Bonues DMG increased the damage of the ring by +17
drgrimmy
11-09-2014, 05:10 PM
One more para gem on your kershal should add 2x4.02 or about 8 damage. This is the 2 damage times your 402% bonus damage.
Edit: at least that is how it should work although the numbers are a little funky, the ring should have added (5+2+2+2)×4.02=44.2 damage, but it added about 50. Go figure...
Ebezaanec
11-09-2014, 05:23 PM
One more para gem on your kershal should add 2x4.02 or about 8 damage. This is the 2 damage times your 402% bonus damage.
Edit: at least that is how it should work although the numbers are a little funky, the ring should have added (5+2+2+2)×4.02=44.2 damage, but it added about 50. Go figure...
Doesn't the first one add 7?
(7+2+2+2) x 4.02 = 52.26 dmg
drgrimmy
11-09-2014, 06:21 PM
Doesn't the first one add 7?
(7+2+2+2) x 4.02 = 52.26 dmg
Yes, 7. 2+5=7. Each gem adds 2 damage, and the effect for wearing any number of gems adds 5 damage. So the first gem adds 2+5=7. Anyways, even if it worked you way, he gained about 50 damage, not 52.26. There must be something else figured into the equation...
Haligali
11-09-2014, 07:00 PM
Yes, 7. 2+5=7. Each gem adds 2 damage, and the effect for wearing any number of gems adds 5 damage. So the first gem adds 2+5=7. Anyways, even if it worked you way, he gained about 50 damage, not 52.26. There must be something else figured into the equation...
I think its because he lost a few int, so his base stats lowered a bit.
heisenberg
11-10-2014, 05:19 AM
wtf.... this gem is very hard for me mind