PDA

View Full Version : The good, the bad and the ugly



Burningdex
01-05-2017, 04:18 PM
Good
-i have currently 70m (lmao) in vanities.
-probably stopped account sharing

Bad
-tradeable vanities
-PvP shields can be worn by bad PvPers
-grat shields on people who didnt buy maps

Ugly
-low levels can wear 3pc rings
-people who worked, spent rl money on this game to get exclusive items and to cap toons, why are these free all of a sudden.

anahadaz
01-05-2017, 05:31 PM
Can't believe all vanities are tradeable, my helm and shield of gratitude mean nothing now

Burningdex
01-05-2017, 05:57 PM
Can't believe all vanities are tradeable, my helm and shield of gratitude mean nothing now

My grat shield was sold for 13m cash

End
01-05-2017, 05:58 PM
My level one character where vanities had to be bought on the character is now pretty useless

Suentous PO
01-05-2017, 09:00 PM
My level one character where vanities had to be bought on the character is now pretty useless

Ditto

11farts

Bazinga!
01-06-2017, 05:38 AM
Items being tradable doesn't mean they are not exclusive. It isnt possible to generate more of those items. You didn't have to sell your grat shield. The fact that these items are circulating now proves that players didn't really value them that much to keep them. And let's not be harsh; I'm sure we were all bad at PvP at one point of time.

Also buying things for real money is not STS' problem. It is against the rules in the first place.

If there's one thing I gotta agree about though, it is the 3pc ring.

Burningdex
01-06-2017, 06:44 AM
Items being tradable doesn't mean they are not exclusive. It isnt possible to generate more of those items. You didn't have to sell your grat shield. The fact that these items are circulating now proves that players didn't really value them that much to keep them. And let's not be harsh; I'm sure we were all bad at PvP at one point of time.

Also buying things for real money is not STS' problem. It is against the rules in the first place.

If there's one thing I gotta agree about though, it is the 3pc ring.

Didnt value them? Definitely not..

Priorema
01-06-2017, 06:59 AM
Also whats the worst, magea even at high levels, has 0 base dodge. My angel mage is pretty useless then even 61 bird can simply combo kill me. I believe angel must have atleast 1-2% dodge per piece and mages musy have atleast 2-4% base dodge

Boiled_35
01-06-2017, 01:17 PM
Also whats the worst, magea even at high levels, has 0 base dodge. My angel mage is pretty useless then even 61 bird can simply combo kill me. I believe angel must have atleast 1-2% dodge per piece and mages musy have atleast 2-4% base dodge

Actually, having been playing 50-71 for quite a while, I was testing builds on each class for 61-66 the highest. Mage still has an equal chance of beating a bird just as viceversa. It all depends on who and how is using the class. :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Priorema
01-06-2017, 01:37 PM
Actually, having been playing 50-71 for quite a while, I was testing builds on each class for 61-66 the highest. Mage still has an equal chance of beating a bird just as viceversa. It all depends on who and how is using the class. :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Im not pvping at 61 yet, but at 56 pally has no chance to kill a bird, but as a fox (I use pure dex) I have equal chances to kill any class. For 66, I see that str bears are balanced as it must be, it tanks as it must do and still get kills not relying only on dodge, but yeah, birds are the problem, as high crit hit and damage makes it most used character at 66. If you will ever do l66 (I know you used to pvp at that level, but dont know about these days) you will see that angel birds are meta for l66

3pc
01-06-2017, 02:36 PM
Items being tradable doesn't mean they are not exclusive. It isnt possible to generate more of those items. You didn't have to sell your grat shield. The fact that these items are circulating now proves that players didn't really value them that much to keep them. And let's not be harsh; I'm sure we were all bad at PvP at one point of time.

Also buying things for real money is not STS' problem. It is against the rules in the first place.

If there's one thing I gotta agree about though, it is the 3pc ring.

He is saying spending money to buy elixers and stuff to level up not buying accounts and items.

Boiled_35
01-06-2017, 02:37 PM
Im not pvping at 61 yet, but at 56 pally has no chance to kill a bird, but as a fox (I use pure dex) I have equal chances to kill any class. For 66, I see that str bears are balanced as it must be, it tanks as it must do and still get kills not relying only on dodge, but yeah, birds are the problem, as high crit hit and damage makes it most used character at 66. If you will ever do l66 (I know you used to pvp at that level, but dont know about these days) you will see that angel birds are meta for l66

I have a 66 bear, bird, and 2 mages—and tested them all (1 Angelic and 1 Islander lol xD). Bears are significantly weaker, birds are a lot stronger, mages are pretty much still equal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sebbyc
01-06-2017, 06:19 PM
Good
-i have currently 70m (lmao) in vanities.
-probably stopped account sharing

Bad
-tradeable vanities
-PvP shields can be worn by bad PvPers
-grat shields on people who didn't buy maps

Ugly
-low levels can wear 3pc rings
-people who worked, spent rl money on this game to get exclusive items and to cap toons, why are these free all of a sudden.

I totally agree with this. I'm an original player since 2010, however, I never capped. Yes, This was a cool update, but anyone has access to old vanities, and everyone is rich from farming grotto. I think there should be a min level on 3pc ring, like 66. And I think other players should have access to fang armor, hallow shield, cop, monarch etc. But there should be a twist to this. Like for example, Monarch helm came out in 2012 I think with 71 cap. And I've started playing on what is now my main acc since 2012. So I Think that players who created their account on the day of that cap vanity came out or before, should have access to the cap vanities. So more easily understood, anyone who has an account created after the cap vanity came out, they should not be able to obtain it. I started in 2012 on Sebbyc, so I'd think its fair to not allow me to get cop, fang, hallow shield, etc. But it would be reasonable to for me to have access to monarch and after that. My mage acc I started in 20120 so I should be able to get cop, fang, hallow etc. But I did not start early enough to get founders. So I'd accept not having access to that. But having all these new players get access to 3pc, cap vanities, superhero vanities, etc I don't think is right. They didn't play back then to get it, so they shouldn't be able to get now.Unless they made their account before something came out. So I wish all these lv1's+ with 3pc ring and newer players who are richer than me and can afford fang armor etc, I think that they shouldn't get the items that existed before they played.

Reunegade
01-06-2017, 06:24 PM
I totally agree with this. I'm an original player since 2010, however, I never capped. Yes, This was a cool update, but anyone has access to old vanities, and everyone is rich from farming grotto. I think there should be a min level on 3pc ring, like 66. And I think other players should have access to fang armor, hallow shield, cop, monarch etc. But there should be a twist to this. Like for example, Monarch helm came out in 2012 I think with 71 cap. And I've played since 2012. So I Think that players who created their account on the day of that cap vanity came out or before, should have access to the cap vanities. So more easily understood, anyone who has an account created after the cap vanity came out, they should not be able to obtain it. I started in 2012 on Sebbyc, so I'd think its fair to not allow me to get cop, fang, hallow shield, etc. But it would be reasonable to for me to have access to monarch and after that. My mage acc I started in 20120 so I should be able to get cop, fang, hallow etc. But I did not start early enough to get founders. So I'd accept not having access to that. But having all these new players get access to 3pc, cap vanities, superhero vanities, etc I don't think is right. They didn't play back then to get it, so they shouldn't be able to get now.Unless they made their account before something came out. So I wish all these lv1's+ with 3pc ring and newer players who are richer than me and can afford fang armor etc, I think that they shouldn't get the items that existed before they played.
"I'm an original player since 2010"

"And I've played since 2012."

Wat

anahadaz
01-06-2017, 06:35 PM
"I'm an original player since 2010"

"And I've played since 2012."

Wat

This is a problem now. Vanities mean nothing so he can say what he wants.

Magmatus
01-06-2017, 06:37 PM
What the hell !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LEVEL ONE
01-06-2017, 06:56 PM
My level one character where vanities had to be bought on the character is now pretty useless

Huehuehuehuehuehuehuehue


The funny thing is that I still can't use the stash or use the auction house, even though everything is tradable now anyway.

Cinco, having a laugh?

Burningdex
01-06-2017, 07:02 PM
Huehuehuehuehuehuehuehue


The funny thing is that I still can't use the stash or use the auction house, even though everything is tradable now anyway.

Cinco, having a laugh? start a petition

sebbyc
01-06-2017, 07:33 PM
"I'm an original player since 2010"

"And I've played since 2012."

Wat

LOL said that wrong. my main account i stared in 2012, but i also have an older acc with a mage from 2010. I said that bad. sorry lol.