PDA

View Full Version : Gauntlet Leaderboard



Golem
12-08-2021, 01:28 PM
Hello
Idk if its right same player is in top10-25 4-6x??
I think it would be fair if you make gauntlet lb prize available for top 50 not 25. Give chance to ppl who are pro but cant get in good team. This player is one example who got at least 4 toons on top lb.
Id he might have more toons. And thats not only one. There is few more other players also. So it would be fair if it is top50 not 25 ty

Cinco
12-08-2021, 01:34 PM
Are you saying that we've got players using macros to 'bot' the event LB?

If so - I insist that you make a report to Customer Service.

Don't call out players on the forums - since you don't know what accounts they own, what toons they use, etc. with any real degree of certainty. Submitting a ticket to CS ensures that the players in question are reviewed and we determine if they're cheating or not.

Thanks!

Oawaoebi
12-08-2021, 01:37 PM
Having like a feature in which is every player can only show up once on lb would be cool. Like for example player 1-4 run hauntlet and have 15sec time . Player 1 runs with player 5-7 and gets 24 sec. The 24 sec run appears on lb but the 25 sec run disappears because player 1 already is on lb. I think that will bring more fairness in it. In elit wdungeoms also would be cool. Maybe also add this to honor ranked lb. Having the same 2 players occupying 7/10 banners really? Banners should be granted to many players and not 1 player 100 banners.

I know some will dislike that idea and much more love it. So be Kind in the following comments.


Gesendet von iPhone 13 mit Tapatalk

Oawaoebi
12-08-2021, 01:40 PM
Are you saying that we've got players using macros to 'bot' the event LB?

If so - I insist that you make a report to Customer Service.

Don't call out players on the forums - since you don't know what accounts they own, what toons they use, etc. with any real degree of certainty. Submitting a ticket to CS ensures that the players in question are reviewed and we determine if they're cheating or not.

Thanks!

I think you misunderstood there something Mr. Barnes. He is not insulting people to use macros. He wants more fairness to other players and diversity on lb. Not always only the same people. And I understand him and can completely agree. Nowadays all lbs have the same players except seasonal lbs.


Gesendet von iPhone 13 mit Tapatalk

Cinco
12-08-2021, 01:41 PM
Having like a feature in which is every player can only show up once on lb would be cool. Like for example player 1-4 run hauntlet and have 15sec time . Player 1 runs with player 5-7 and gets 24 sec. The 24 sec run appears on lb but the 25 sec run disappears because player 1 already is on lb. I think that will bring more fairness in it. In elit wdungeoms also would be cool. Maybe also add this to honor ranked lb. Having the same 2 players occupying 7/10 banners really? Banners should be granted to many players and not 1 player 100 banners.

I know some will dislike that idea and much more love it. So be Kind in the following comments.


Gesendet von iPhone 13 mit Tapatalk

Definitely feels unfair to penalize one player for involving themselves with more than one group of other players. I think the consequences of this would be negative for finding parties overall, and a firm penalty for players who are on at various times to play with friends around the world.

Cinco
12-08-2021, 01:41 PM
I think you misunderstood there something Mr. Barnes. He is not insulting people to use macros. He wants more fairness to other players and diversity on lb. Not always only the same people. And I understand him and can completely agree. Nowadays all lbs have the same players except seasonal lbs.


Gesendet von iPhone 13 mit Tapatalk

No. I understood... and I made an insistence as a result of that understanding. Thanks!

Golem
12-08-2021, 01:43 PM
Are you saying that we've got players using macros to 'bot' the event LB?

If so - I insist that you make a report to Customer Service.

Don't call out players on the forums - since you don't know what accounts they own, what toons they use, etc. with any real degree of certainty. Submitting a ticket to CS ensures that the players in question are reviewed and we determine if they're cheating or not.

Thanks!

Sry i didnt meant to report player just was example and i didnt said he uaing bot or something. I said they run with them own different toons many times and they will get almlst all lb prizes wich ia unfair for other players why i ask for to make them top50 prize or make lb prize one per player/acc. Trust me my english s*x but mine ideas been many times used later. Sry for my bad english

Cinco
12-08-2021, 01:46 PM
Sry i didnt meant to report player just was example and i didnt said he uaing bot or something. I said they run with them own different toons many times and they will get almlst all lb prizes wich ia unfair for other players why i ask for to make them top50 prize or make lb prize one per player/acc. Trust me my english s*x but mine ideas been many times used later. Sry for my bad english

I edited your post to remove the toon names; since we don't allow call-outs. If you don't want to report these names to CS, that's fine... but I think we can agree that it's hardly "unfair" when a player plays legitimately and scoops up the prizes.

Golem
12-08-2021, 01:57 PM
Omg this meant for pocket legends not arcane legends

Cinco
12-08-2021, 01:58 PM
Omg this meant for pocket legends not arcane legends

Thread moved.

Golem
12-08-2021, 02:03 PM
Can you make or change rewardz to Top 15 / top50 ty. It would be more fair

Cinco
12-08-2021, 02:11 PM
Can you make or change rewardz to Top 15 / top50 ty. It would be more fair

No - but I will consider it for next year's Fury event.

Changing it now would be extremely unfair. It's also a huge slap in the face to everyone who's been trying to get those top ranks.

Golem
12-08-2021, 02:31 PM
Can you come up with or invent a small a top50 Vanity award/prize? =)

Cinco
12-08-2021, 02:38 PM
Can you come up with or invent a small a top50 Vanity award/prize? =)

Yes but I’m not going to because it would be unfair. Maybe next year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Golem
12-08-2021, 02:52 PM
Alr np ty for amswers. + what would be fair it to not make gauntlet prizes tradable. Thanks. Cust that would be unfair if they make also a lot of gold cus they/same player can hold many prizes.

Cinco
12-08-2021, 03:00 PM
Alr np ty for amswers. + what would be fair it to not make gauntlet prizes tradable. Thanks. Cust that would be unfair if they make also a lot of gold cus they/same player can hold many prizes.

Not happening. Not changing. Super unfair!

Go get some of the prizes instead of trying to ruin them for the top ranks, please.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Endpoints
12-08-2021, 11:56 PM
Yes but I’m not going to because it would be unfair. Maybe next year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The thing is not everyone can try or make it into the LB because of the elixirs availability. We need more 5x damage elixir flasks, and maybe also make a lootable 4x armor flasks too? Or just made them available in the event vendor for tokens or platinum (tradeable) for the next gauntlet type events.

Dispressor
12-09-2021, 02:31 PM
The problem is the stack of same player in an lb with the same account or with a different one.
And the problem result very clear in hauntlet and shuyal planar arena leaderboard.
I never ever saw a competition were the same guy (or group of 3-4) won 1st-2nd-3rd-4th-5th and all the others placements prices.
Those guys have the best gears in the game and they deserves the top spots for sure, but what about a player that is satisfied with a 6th or 7th place and got systematically kicked out of lb because of the stacking recorded times of a top one.
Not to mention that some of those players do it intentionally to make banners "rare", and you know exactly what I'm talking about.
I don't know if the problem is solvable because it's really difficult to prove that different account are owned by the same guy without violate the privacy, but I want to expose the problem Anyway maybe in the future it can be fixed in some way.