The New Trading Restriction

[pewpewlazur]

I just wanted to petition to change the trading system back. It's far too much of a hassle to trade 4 at a time.

[Survivorfan]

I agree 100%

[goatycoady]

Me 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! U have to change back!!!!!!!!!

[Arterra]

someone describe this to me, this old way... i cannot remember a change :/

[Raxie]

maybe you can't remember the change because you weren't here when the change happened.

[Vyvin]

Rofl!(i think ive used rofl in all my posts atleast once![UPDATE REQUIRED])
before to sell a billion pinks u could show all of them now its 4 at a time...
i dont know because i havent traded nyone since the update?
/Vyvin

[Raxie]

someone describe this to me, this old way... i cannot remember a change :/
do you know that they are talking about the most recent path they did; 1.4?
i just downloaded the recent patch and the new trading system is so annoying! you can only list 4 items at a time; i don't know why the devs did this.

[knockk]

agreed. tedious and unnessecary...plz plz fix ittt!!

[Fireiceboy]

agreed. change it back!

[SpeedWeed]

they did this probably to fix latency issues.

the secure trading probably sending too many tells to the server.

the new 4 item trade system is annoying. limiting to 10 would be a more appropriate number.

[regie831]

they did this probably to fix latency issues.

the secure trading probably sending too many tells to the server.

the new 4 item trade system is annoying. limiting to 10 would be a more appropriate number.
hmm yeah i think that seems fair...but maybe not

[Raxie]

at least 10... devs, 4 items is just too few a number.

[SpeedWeed]

at least 10... devs, 4 items is just too few a number.

i play with a 300-400 ping.

recently it's been spiking upwards to 500-600 which makes it almost unplayable sometimes.

if the move helps the server. 10 is a nice number.

though this won't be so much of a problem when the auction house is finally introduced.

[Protank]

Idk i think it ok. Idk how many times i had to give people ther stuff back cuz they didnt realize they left a bunjch of stuff in trade without knowing it.

[Protank]

Sry cant type today..

[Arterra]

oohh just found out... :(
heh sorry, only noticed a update on appstore after this thread...

[pewpewlazur]

It's really quite bad. If there were any other trading options up, like an auction house (which I think is in development) but as of right now trading is the only way to sell items.

[Boboeye]

I have not found the Devs to be greedy at all but this may be a way to cut trading in prep for the auction house.

My thought is that an auction house will give you one slot for free and charge platinum for more slots.

Someone who could trade 10 items at a time is less likely to buy more auction slots.

Or all this could just be from newb complaints.

[Royce]

I am in favor of the new system mostly for the reaon Protank mentioned, and I believe that is why the devs implemented this. However I don't really care all that much, but I don't think this will even be an issue once the Auction Hous is complete.

[flaimdude]

4 items at a time. :/ Hm. I'm thinking nope, lol.

[TwinkTastical]

I have not found the Devs to be greedy at all but this may be a way to cut trading in prep for the auction house.

My thought is that an auction house will give you one slot for free and charge platinum for more slots.

Someone who could trade 10 items at a time is less likely to buy more auction slots.

Or all this could just be from newb complaints.

http://i876.photobucket.com/albums/ab330/instinctiveko/cf6d5a56.jpg

[Arterra]

i would hope at least 2 free auction slots. we get so many pinks, 1 doesn't cut it.

[Futumsh]

The trading change had nothing to do with the auction house, and everything to do with the extra customer service load from people not paying attention and trading away items not on the current page, then complaining about it.

[Arterra]

The trading change had nothing to do with the auction house, and everything to do with the extra customer service load from people not paying attention and trading away items not on the current page, then complaining about it.
good point, though a hassle for those who are aware of what they are doing. maybe just a more prominent arrow, and a # of items present

[TwinkTastical]

The trading change had nothing to do with the auction house, and everything to do with the extra customer service load from people not paying attention and trading away items not on the current page, then complaining about it.

Maybe.... Make the layout ... like this
Item Item Item Item
Item Item ITEM Item
etc etc etc
Gold Pots pots

[Raxie]

how about if a number is on the side showing how many items are being displayed. this could be an easier solution.
edit: just realised arterra suggested the same thing.

[Purist]

Agreed bring back the full trade capabilities !

[KingFu]

at least 10... devs, 4 items is just too few a number.

They made it 4 because it's a 4 items per page deal, but seriously, please change it back!

How about have the arrow flash red to indicate there is more than one page? Or maybe have a warning to say that there is more than one page?

[vulgarstrike]

I recently was unable to show all my wares because of the 4 limit, and could not get the other person to remember all of them at once... I don't think the limitation is necessary, how about just making more items fit per page?

[Xviperr]

good point, though a hassle for those who are aware of what they are doing. maybe just a more prominent arrow, and a # of items present


how about if a number is on the side showing how many items are being displaying. this could be an easier solution.
edit: just realised arterra suggested the same thing.

i agree that with a Number of item in the trade page is being display would be a good alternative.
instead of just 4 items per trade (: