View Full Version : is CS useful in d new bosses?
ShadowGunX
04-20-2013, 10:00 PM
just wondering if CS is useful in d new bosses or not. in d kraken bosses CS is total useless.
m lvl26 still now nd m bit lazy to lvl up :-P.
anybody gone through all new bosses using CS? is it cancels out boss' windups?
Weagledan
04-21-2013, 11:45 AM
yea I just tried respecing with CS to test it out in Nordr - it's no different than kraken (doesn't interrupt bosses attacks). It makes sense that it doesn't interrupt because it could make the bosses too easy, but i figured I'd test it anyway. I'm respecing back to wind mill now.
IGN: Barun
ShadowGunX
04-21-2013, 03:16 PM
thanx for testing out. CS is useless. only useful to knockbck nd interrupt mobs only :-(
VB is also nerfed which makes warrior less fun :-(
razerfingers
04-21-2013, 03:25 PM
I was disappointed when i heard all the fun stuff doesnt work anymore lol.
Sent using blood on a bathroom wall.
Wowsome
04-22-2013, 02:06 AM
thanx for testing out. CS is useless. only useful to knockbck nd interrupt mobs only :-(
VB is also nerfed which makes warrior less fun :-(
i still use both cs and vb in pvp, and im happy.
Excuses
04-22-2013, 07:14 AM
Yes. Cs+vb is great in pvp.
And works fine in pve for taunting too.
But cutting off it's ability just to make bosses difficult sound ridiculous.
It works on 20% chance only anyways. =/
Teoijio
04-24-2013, 06:28 PM
So if the interrupt does not work, does the feeble debuff work on bosses?
Wowsome
04-25-2013, 06:00 AM
So if the interrupt does not work, does the feeble debuff work on bosses?
i believe so, but i dont think there is a way to test it.
ishyrionek
04-25-2013, 08:46 AM
i believe so, but i dont think there is a way to test it.
There should be small red icon of crossed sword or somethink.
Same *** for decreasing deffense or decreasse attack.
inkredible
04-25-2013, 09:20 AM
yeah there should be a big red exclamation mark if feeble works
and as far as i know.. it doesnt work on bosses -
Teoijio
04-25-2013, 03:09 PM
well that is a huge disappointment... again.
Thanks for the info.