Peace through repetition! Thanks H2N, will be interesting to see how this plays out when newer guilds come up and maybe be even younger than us!
Printable View
I think it will make people think twice about disbanding and making new guilds. Perhaps instill some commitment and longevity into the guild system.
If this will happen the longer guild will get points i think we should reset the clock.
lets say all guild age should start from the next update.
2014-05-07 listing posted, using the middle ground proposal.
thanks h2n
We need some incentive against tearing down a guild and build up a new one just so. The reason: Stability is a criteria wich suggests a system that works. Drama is handled properly, activity is secure and experience is traded down to new members. Otherwise those "old" guild wouldn't exist.
If we dont have a criteria like this, then statistics wouldn't reflect some of the most important decision-making facts for a lot of gamers, especially if we think of guilds in the terms StS suggested right from the beginning: as families for the players.
I find it oddly satisfying the guild ranking is decided similarly to figure skating. The wide range of unwitted humor is a huge plus.
All that said, it really is the most fair.
Is it guild age? Or avg of members' account age? Anyone can clarify?
—AshDex
Each is a category. Guild age and average member account age. Although guild age is not accurate in the cases where a guild was accidentally disbanded at one point. The most recent date of formation (i.e. the date of the disbanding / reforming) is used in these cases, not the original founding date of the guild.
Hmm thanks :)
Last qsn:
Are players below 21 level spared from the avg account age as they are from other catagory?
—AshDex
Kind of silly rank
This, and we all know why some people are saying this, because they're a powerful new guild lol, it should most definitely be added in since c'mon, how much will it change ? Keeping a long standing guild is definitely a lot of hard work and although I haven't had one here, I know the pressure of being a leader and having to maintain and keep recruiting members, even if its in a game, so many factors are contributed to making sure that guild stays alive, but of course some of the newer top guilds wouldn't like that and would prefer it to stay this way so they don't have to wait as long as come guilds like DM and CU have...also guilds will have more importance and not every other weak player will waste his saved 50k if he thinks he wont be able to make the lb, besides its about the effort and dedication the officers and all these masters put in, idk how ink does it but ik I would never match up to that much work, making contests recruiting , helping guildies, making records on lb
Just to go and get shown up by a bunch of rich kids who decided they wana be a guild one day, gg.
We should also have a separate pvp rank for guilds, maybe like a gold prize to Gm's at the end of every season, maybe a guild fund or plats I was thinking banner for the gm and officers of top or top 3 guilds to recognize their effort(for overall guild lb not pvp one) I'm sure a lot of people would agree with this, as the old guild officers would receive recognition