Top Guilds Listing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by H2N

Congrats to GOA (and Zuzeq)

---

Thank you Sir

Judgement 10 more spots :)

Elitista please

What rank is <Present Giver> ? Problably one of the lowest, thats a solo guild and the maste5 is lvl 17 :apthy:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sprtcuz

Elitista please

---

67. Elitista

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amandasuper

What rank is <Present Giver> ? Problably one of the lowest, thats a solo guild and the maste5 is lvl 17 :apthy:

---

Not in the 2013-09-04 listing. If the guild was created after the 2013-09-04 listing, it will show up in next week's (2013-09-11) listing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darko

Judgement 10 more spots :)

---

Yup, I wonder if we will enter the top 50 at #1. It's very possible. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Energizeric

Yup, I wonder if we will enter the top 50 at #1. It's very possible. :)

---

Pheonix entered at #5 so anything is possible. Still though, it's not going to be easy to leapfrog the EOS/DM/CU juggernauts.

magnetto please.
Thanks

Purple nation update pls th

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Energizeric

Yup, I wonder if we will enter the top 50 at #1. It's very possible. :)

---

It is always good to dream ha? XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nickaizoku

magnetto please.
Thanks

---

84. Magnetto

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Og kush

Purple nation update pls th

---

110. Purple Nation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deadroth

It is always good to dream ha? XD

---

I don't know if it's such a far fetched dream. Our guild is all over the leaderboards way more than any other. We currently have the top 2 players, 3 of the top 4, and I believe 7 or 8 of the top 25. We also have a ton of players on all of the other leaderboards. As soon as we qualify by having enough APs to make the top 50, then we will be ranked on averages instead of on totals, and I think its likely we would be #1.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by H2N

Pheonix entered at #5 so anything is possible. Still though, it's not going to be easy to leapfrog the EOS/DM/CU juggernauts.

---

Considering DM liquidated 200 inactives, we are probably going to drop a few spots, but we will recover, you can count on that :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Azepeiete

Considering DM liquidated 200 inactives, we are probably going to drop a few spots, but we will recover, you can count on that :)

---

Unless those inactives had very good stats, then you would actually improve. Once you make the top 50 in total APs, then your rank goes by averages, not totals. So total number of members means nothing, it's the average stats per member that counts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Energizeric

Unless those inactives had very good stats, then you would actually improve. Once you make the top 50 in total APs, then your rank goes by averages, not totals. So total number of members means nothing, it's the average stats per member that counts.

---

Drop the noobs!

This is bramer - signing out

You'll have low AP rank tho, but maybe other stats could improve with less members

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Energizeric

Unless those inactives had very good stats, then you would actually improve. Once you make the top 50 in total APs, then your rank goes by averages, not totals. So total number of members means nothing, it's the average stats per member that counts.

---

Energizeric is wise. Take a look at the 2013-09-11 listing and compare it to the 2013-09-04 listing, and see how DM's strategy paid off - dropped in AP rank because of lost members, but gained in all the % active ranks, because of all those inactives that got removed.

Thanks for the list!