or simply minimized the respawn button, so that we can what's in the background, but yes, 3s invulnerability won't hurt... we can't move at the first few seconds, but we can receive damage... that's just simply wrong
Printable View
or simply minimized the respawn button, so that we can what's in the background, but yes, 3s invulnerability won't hurt... we can't move at the first few seconds, but we can receive damage... that's just simply wrong
why not this idea,
no invincibility instead
for 3sec any such SNARE BLEED POISON or any other DOT effect cannot apply to us,
boss hits or mob attacks on respawn counts if we get hit (its only fair in the boss side of view)
DOT effects dont apply to us for 3secs ...... if anyone else agrees, do thank or something to give this more importance???? maybe????
UP
11 character
lol please mages have so many benefits now and almost same armor stats as rogues now, they've got amazing arcane staff which recks bosses and amazing hex staff which recks mobs, the problem is, I, the warrior am the only one suffering the damage and warriors mostly spam biggest amounts of pots, and most of mages who I run with are using heals in elites so yeah I think mages should be a support class and not the healing or damage class, means that they should buff warriors who tank and rogues doing the main damage, ty.
Mage shouldn't be a healing class.....wow....
We are talking about ankh revives.
Fyi other classes can get hit idk where u get warriors are only ones getting hit.
Remember the term almost you used,this almost makes a difference.
Weapons have nothing to do with ankh revives.
Mage using revives in elites has nothing to do with ankh revives.
Please stay on topic.Also it's a good thing to rethink what you are going to say as all of what you said but maybe a few words even pretain to the op.
Remember how old (existing) DOT stop working on a boss after it use reflect? And that new DOT will work and get reflected (and probably kill yourself if same level elite)?
It should apply for ankh revive too
Well..... If you look at your post, you WERE replying to him, so makes sense for him to respond........
Attachment 152634