I think he was joking
Printable View
I see lately that there are more "2010" players than when i joined in like 2011!
To get back on topic:
Cinco, I like the idea behind the +/- 2 pvp change, and when I first heard of it, I supported the idea a 100%. However, on most pvp levels, we really need all the players we can get to maintain a fun environment. I haven't really followed the discussions on the matter, but it would be great if it could be possibly determined at hosting whether a game should be +/- 2 or 5, however if this is not a possibility, then 5 would be the better standard solution. Since the change, even though we are trying to keep things alive on the player side (at least some of us) lvl 51-56 pvp (my home) is barren. Thanks for all the work you put into working with PL btw!
TLDR: +1 to +/-5
I think the 5 level difference just encourages exploitation of the set differences between levels. Thus, I believe that 50+ should keep the level range of +/- 2 while all those levels below (because they don't have sets) should we switched back to the +/- 5 level differential. Yes, lower level PvP will be a bit harder, but it doesn't have the player base to sustain a +/- 2 level gap.
I disagree. Although some levels of pvp have died, it's much more balanced and I'm grateful for that. I'm sick of 25-27s teaming my 22
Ya'll need endgame :chuncky:
I like the +/-2 for lvl 50+... But at the lower lvls it's kinda annoying :D
It brought back l10 - 13...
L10 - 12 fun in ffa with decent players.
I support the +/- 5 level PvP range.
I'm surprised that so many people disagree with this. At 56+ I can't find a single game to join ever. 71 was regarded the most active PvP level and somehow now I have to wait 20 minutes for one person to join and leave after a minute. I've been online at almost all timings. The result was the same every time.
Playing higher levels is a part of the PvP experience. There is nothing to complain about when you can always level up to their level or higher. The fact that you want to stay at a lower level is your choice.
Resurfacing this thread, we need the pvp restrictions again, we know u want ppl to cap and spend money but it also wrecked alot of peoples fun, it is still a game.
Totally agree with this thread. The +\- 5 pvp restrictions should return.
I agree I really wish 5 level difference would come back...I enjoyed pvp at 66 and 71 and having that taken away and rushed by 100 is no fun.
I just miss lowlvl pvp
Serious +1.
Level Restriction PlZ (-/+5) -_-
We need +/-5 back it made all pvp lvls active and created chances for people to enjoy the game at any level without worrying about people that were 30-40+ lvls higher joining and boosting off of them and ruining pvp for everyone.
I doubt it will be re-implemented, as much as that pains me to say.