Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cahaun
Happens a lot. There quite a few Battlefield and Call of Duty fanboys that like to fight at each other all the time with random interjections by Halo and Arma fanboys.
I tend to avoid comparing different games as, when you do, all you get is flaming and overreacting fanboys.
Trolls take advantage of it and purposely shout out that "LOL Bloops is waaaay better than Battlefield! LOL". Gets annoying seeing stuff like this, but we can avoid it all by respecting people even if they play a game you don't like.
I rarely see Arma fanboys anywhere. CoD fans are usually the overreacting people though since it is such an overrated game, same for Halo 4 (Halo 3 is still my favorite game of all time, mostly because of campaign and Forge). Battlefield is rightfully good. Sometimes games won't be entertaining, but when the match gets good, it gets REALLY GOOD. Call of Duty is a similar experience each time, kill stuff, earn points, level up. Battlefield is a very varied experience, sometimes boring, sometimes epic. Halo is so customizable that you can practically make Call of Duty inside Halo. Pocket Legends is a fully cooperative game with far more customization (than CoD and Battlefield combined) and requires a good amount of knowledge and talent to play.
Every game has it's own play style, but that doesn't classify the skill it takes. And skill doesn't classify if a game is good or not. Minecraft for example, no skill, good game (that's being said by a player who despises playing Minecraft). Another example is League of Legends, it requires a crap load of talent, skill, customization and experience, but only 32 million players like the game (bad example? I don't care).