^most bears know how to use their class well already through past experience.
Printable View
^most bears know how to use their class well already through past experience.
@Ghost I agree with all your points!! I would however like it if the orb could be fixed, ex: able to buff and opponents can't target you. But if it can't be fixed if rather it just removed.
I see Crim's point about why savage has the stats that it does but it does make other classes OP. Wasn't the point of STS lowering the stat requirements to create variety in toons and wearable gear? I don't know if raising base requirements will fix the problem. I would just prefer that if a different class wears gear not meant for them then that stats get nerfed. I'm sure this would be difficult to implement but it would allow bears the stats it needs.
@Caurd just because you played "from the beginning" it doesn't mean you always need to talk down to ppl. There are ways to get your point across by using a different tone.
Yes, but the way you act makes it like its Azichiabed drama all over again.Quote:
Originally Posted by lonleybird
-trash talking etc...
Enough of this. Back to the topic~
@Crim - That's an excellent point. I never took the stat attributes into account because they never seemed important... not even remotely important for this game, haha. But yes, it does make sense. Still though, I will hold my argument for thinking that the savage set still has an edge in terms of a bad correlation between strength and armor.
lol, I don't consider someone is silly or not in a game forums, unlike most of the peoples, I sometime don't even look left side to see who posted the comment, if the comment look odd to me I critisize.Quote:
For those who ignore crim and think hes a silly guy (cuard, waug) , I can give a short summary
as for example many times I said bears +90 DMG buffs should be nerfed, so no point to argue with when someone else says that. savage is op in many terms other than just making it bears op, though I would not consider a bear is op with Savage, rather for example take a bird 40 dodge with savage + 30 dodge for buff = 70 dodge, even with stacking dodge bears reach approx 80 dodge, then consider a mage with heavy DMG with drain and fire they are getting secured with savage and still their DMG is high enough.
to be honest endgame is all about op-ness now, which build and gears have advantage over any other particular build and class, just use it for example a savage bear may struggle against a decent plaher so, use a talon/ bow mostly depending on auto that high damage of talon/bow +90 dmg buff , there are many examples not only this one. Many players consistently suggest for class specific gears, when devs asked, it was in my wish list to increase the required attribute point to equip endgame gears its too low 157 ATM, this would force classes to use class specific gears, but devs hardly listen good suggestions they just kept making political decisions.
The only problem I see with savage is that if it had lowered dmg, pallies, bears and mages actually in general, perhaps even tank rhinos, would be extremely difficult to kill, because of regen and heal (mages n rhinos), it's hard to balance endgame since every spell does like 500 dmg and players have 600hp lol. Pl doesn't have very detailed pvp, so pure tank would be less than useless, if he dealt nearly no dmg, unlike for instance WoW or OaC. Like there are no cast times in pl which sucks, so u can't like interrupt heal, thus with lowered dmg, certain classes would have no chance. Sorry if it doesn't make sense, it's morning here, i may rephrase it lol.
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by gison
Bears need higher armor but lower dodge, and what crim said with the hit % buff rather than so much damage.
I would love a hit buff in Rage! We would see more STR bears running around doing what they were meant to do: tank.
You know what I would love? People spelling correctly and using good grammar:) It makes everything ten times easier to read and it doesn't make you sound like a 8 year old.
Great feedback, bro! Are you doing 35 right now?Quote:
Originally Posted by XghostzX
You have a fragment and run-on sentence. Independent clauses must/can be separated with comma followed by a conjunction. You forgot the comma, but since this is not a place where formal writing is necessary, you do not sound like an eight year old.Quote:
Originally Posted by LvlCap
My opinion on the orb system.. I don't think it needs to be rid because when a mage revives someone in the middle of ctf map or anywhere else and they are in a big battle and are needed for help, they should be allowed to buff up, not get rooted, frozen, stunned or anything. When they spawn with the orb, they should be allowed to stay willingly or get away from the action.
The reason why I think this is better is because when a mage revives someone in battle and they don't have the orb, they don't have time to buff like birds buffing their dodge, because I myself as a mage will focus on them right away, use frosbite and firestorm and kill them instantly. Orb doesn't need to be rid of, it just needs to be fixed.
I think everyone before orbs were completely fine when they get up from being revived.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aoeqt:1279068
The orbs in revive arent even needed. If what you said would happen, the best team endgame CTF would maybe be a team consisting of pallies?
Lol about the 35 pvp when i was voodoo mage vs voodoo mage both 35 it took so long. never even finished the fight the other players killed each other so the game ended before i even finished the fight
honestly my opinion on orbs is that i do not like it at all. 1. it is because whats the point of invulnerablilty for spawning if u cant even use skills to kill the spawner.
2. the invulnerablilty orb should only be in the spawn room so if u would get revived by mage or rhino u cant even do anything all u can do is run around waiting for the orb to disappear then u can use buffs adn skills
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny6880
The general definition of overpowered in a multiplayer setting in any game is: Where a set is so dominant over all other options that skill is no longer a factor. I haven't been here in months, but even looking at the set, well, it does have it's weak points (hit), but let me put it this way, if I were in a betting pool with 2 players of roughly equal skill of the same class, betting would statistically favor the savage against all other sets.Quote:
Originally Posted by XghostzX
The orb system I think is causing more issues than it is solving, so I agree that the game should remove it or give the option to the host to play without them when hosting a new game.
To be honest, the game needs a ground up revamp of the PvP system, at least at end game. It is well, right now, built mainly as a PvE type of game with PvP kind of bolted on. I firmly believe that with reform, it would be possible to make a relatively balanced PvP game while keeping PvE classes assigned to their lore roles (and each balanced at it).
Good to see you sir, appreciate your response. It's just that STS stated (in a recent patch thread) that their engine doesn't allow them to make specific changes that we see in AL. So I agree - they should remove the orbs.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsThis
As far as a revamp for PvP, I don't see much happening. STS recently said some major balance was coming on the way, but I've yet to see it after providing lots of time on giving quality feedback. I'm disappointed; but I'm not a business. STS has it's prioritizations and I respect it, regardless.
The bulk of the focus will remain on Arcane Legends. On the Android platform for example, it has perhaps 5 times as many downloads as PL (5 million+ vs 1 million+). Assuming similar monetization percentages, AL generates 5x as much revenue. Strictly from a business standpoint, it would be logical to conclude that focusing primarily on AL is a rational business decision, at least unless interest in AL begins to decline, at which point a PL revival may be a way to generate better overall business revenues.