Singe vs Sam

[Firezmz]

Hi All AL:

I'm not good at PVP. However, By comparing Stat Singe Vs Sam, Why is Sam more preferable in PvP? Whereas, Singe stat is higher than Sam ??? Thank you in Advance

And Here is the Screen Shot.

[Appeltjes]

Banish stun or whatever sam has a lot of chance in his passive or aa

[CAK Vader]

You may also want to double check the crit!

[Firezmz]

Thanks, and yes the critical is only thing higher than Singe. . I just wondering Why they prefer Sam in PVP.
Maybe I really need the Pro to make my mind clear.

[Visiting]

Sam has a high chance to "Panic" AKA stun (for around 2-3seconds) plus that crit, making Sam a deadly beast in PVP (more so for rogues than other classes). Meanwhile, Singe, gives AWESOME stats and his Arcane Ability buffs your stats and stuns 75% of the time anyways. So, in my personal opinion as a mage, Singe>Sam for PVE/PVP.

[Schnitzel]

I don't have either but the description for Sam in the Stable says "Has a pasive healing effect in combat"..

[Farminer's]

I would use singe if I was a mage Sam for rogue with crit.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

[vawaid]

people usually use singe for low level pvp. Samael for higher level is better. CMIIW

[Migzorille]

Samael has massive DoT damage and it has a passive health and mana regen

[kjed]

Singe for twinks
Sam for endgame

[matanofx]

You think singe stuns but in pvp battles it doesnt, why?

Because warriors/rogues/mages all have attacks that trigger stun immunity, meaning after you stun an opponent they have 7 seconds stun immunity, as a mage you use full charged fire ball all the time which is a good example for stun immunity trigger, making singes stun useless

Sam however has panic, not stun, thats what makes his AA so useful.
Stats using singe look alot nicer thats true but when you talk about pvp its not just about the stats, sam gives you panic/heals your hp/gives you crit/causes poison dmg to opponents, thus is the better pvp pet for mage.

[Firezmz]

You think singe stuns but in pvp battles it doesnt, why?

Because warriors/rogues/mages all have attacks that trigger stun immunity, meaning after you stun an opponent they have 7 seconds stun immunity, as a mage you use full charged fire ball all the time which is a good example for stun immunity trigger, making singes stun useless

Sam however has panic, not stun, thats what makes his AA so useful.
Stats using singe look alot nicer thats true but when you talk about pvp its not just about the stats, sam gives you panic/heals your hp/gives you crit/causes poison dmg to opponents, thus is the better pvp pet for mage.

This is Clear Explanation for Mage. Thank You

[Instanthumor]

This is Clear Explanation for Mage. Thank You

Sam > Singe in pvp

Just keep Sam on autofeed while in pvp and you're good to go. Do you need a build?

[Alhuntrazeck]

Sam is still king of the hill because of its huge panic chance on AA and slight chance on passive. This panic, as matan explained above, ignores stun immunity so you can use fireball -> samael's AA to keep an opponent locked for about 5+ seconds!

[Firezmz]

Sam > Singe in pvp

Just keep Sam on autofeed while in pvp and you're good to go. Do you need a build?

Yes i do really need a build for it. If you got the time, please write here. Much appreciated

[Axesam]

vs with singe n sam win.