L76/77 mage build

[Meege]

I'm up to try some new builds ..... Anyone has 76/77 build for mage?

[Sheugokin]

Pure or Str or Dex?

[Waug]

TBH U don't need a build u only need a str set.

[Groaning]

TBH U don't need a build u only need a str set.

And some common sense

[Meege]

I'm just looking for a build.... Something with str is cool by me

[Groaning]

For pally 9 buffs 9 debuffs 9 light 9 heal is good no need for anything else

[End]

For pally 9 buffs 9 debuffs 9 light 9 heal is good no need for anything else

That's exaggerating the op-ness

You can't kill anything with just light

The bear 9 beckon stomp rage is realistic cos it works

[Waug]

That's exaggerating the op-ness

You can't kill anything with just light

The bear 9 beckon stomp rage is realistic cos it works

ya that's not enough, build should b drain fire, or if somebody ask for smallest build I'd say 'fire' ofc buffs r thr.
hence

small build => drain fire ice
smaller build => drain fire
smallest build => fire
(not in a sequence)

[Beezlewtf]

I'm just looking for a build.... Something with str is cool by me

I love pure int Mage the best... And I never use debuffs as one. Give it a try! Basically 9 everything, 1 rev and 1 ice storm, 0 on the debuffs. Use the remaining points on rev for lower mana cost. That's what I do

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[represents]

And some common sense

True but do you have lust set meege?

[Motivating]

I love pure int Mage the best... And I never use debuffs as one. Give it a try! Basically 9 everything, 1 rev and 1 ice storm, 0 on the debuffs. Use the remaining points on rev for lower mana cost. That's what I do

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You...
You neglect debuffs for points into rev for, LESS mana cost?

[Nightorday]

You...
You neglect debuffs for points into rev for, LESS mana cost?

you don't rly need debuffs for an int Mage Lel u can use it if u want but for pallies yeh u need debuffs

[Motivating]

Did I ask for a tutorial on how to play int mage?

[AppleNoob]

Did I ask for a tutorial on how to play int mage?

Nope, but you did ask for his reasoning and he gave it. Your fault, not his.

[Mothwing]

Ugh another Pally.

I don't get why more people don't play int mage. Like is it too much of a learning curve? It's easily one of the most fun classes to play if you become good at it. Running around with your head cut off spamming skills and a sword is so boring to me.

I dunno, I'd just love to see people go out of their comfort zone and stop following the typical "just use str" advice.

And the low mana cost on rev is honestly huge. When you're fighting a str player (which you will be because of how lame end game is), the more mana you can save as a mage the better. The minute you run out of mana you're dead.

It's even bigger in mage fights. The first mage to run out of mana is dead. It's pretty simple to be honest. Besides, debuffs are really not necessary considering how unbalanced the gear is. I'd rather spend points in nuking skills like lighting, fire, drain, etc.

EDIT: Then again, if you're playing pally I don't get why you're here in the first place. Throw a basic skill distribution together and you're fine. Have fun tanking entire combos and nuking at the same time.

[Nightorday]

Lel wow u should join Family cuz then u would fit in with ur str sets Hueheheheeh

[Motivating]

Nope, but you did ask for his reasoning and he gave it. Your fault, not his.

Not his post. Again learn to read.

[AppleNoob]

Not his post. Again learn to read.

His post correlates into the question and answering. Learn to connect.

[Beezlewtf]

Nope, but you did ask for his reasoning and he gave it. Your fault, not his.

Oh he actually wanted to know why I didn't bother using debuffs in endgame pvp? With 80%+ of them are str characters with 45+ dodge? In a 3v3 setting. Which is more common than not, i believe it's better to have an int Mage that's focused on straight damage skills while the other two players are basically on the line, either with bears with their hs and pull. Both stun and debuff, or with pallies, dodge and debuffs, or even birds with their root debuffs and moderate dodge. And as int you want to keep the distance and ms when necessary. I don't see the need for debuffs as a 3v3 setting. But that's just my perspective and take on a pure int Mage.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Beezlewtf]

Ugh another Pally.

I don't get why more people don't play int mage. Like is it too much of a learning curve? It's easily one of the most fun classes to play if you become good at it. Running around with your head cut off spamming skills and a sword is so boring to me.

I dunno, I'd just love to see people go out of their comfort zone and stop following the typical "just use str" advice.

And the low mana cost on rev is honestly huge. When you're fighting a str player (which you will be because of how lame end game is), the more mana you can save as a mage the better. The minute you run out of mana you're dead.

It's even bigger in mage fights. The first mage to run out of mana is dead. It's pretty simple to be honest. Besides, debuffs are really not necessary considering how unbalanced the gear is. I'd rather spend points in nuking skills like lighting, fire, drain, etc.

EDIT: Then again, if you're playing pally I don't get why you're here in the first place. Throw a basic skill distribution together and you're fine. Have fun tanking entire combos and nuking at the same time.

____

Most likely too much of a learning curve


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk