I did some work on Italian Wikipedia and used to patrolling - looking new voices in real-time and tagging them for completeness, relevance, no copyright violation and similar. Sometimes I proposed a voice for deletion because something wrong (expecially in relevance and self-promotion). If the voice is deleted for one of these reasons (after a vote, the first time), the admins usually delete it immediately if the voice is created again, without any vote.
I noted the new voices are tagged yet. I suggest you all to expand the voices with references to publications, both online and printed, and rewrite some phrases from a more neutral point of view. This helps to avoid deletion proposal or (in the case) to justify a negative vote for the deletion.
Bookmarks