Housing 2.0 Guide

[Justg]

I don't know what this is based on, but it's not players' feedback. The suggestion with the strongest opposition is the most prominent feature of Housing 2.0.

There was a large amount of feedback about the lack of usefulness of housing with regards to power in game. Any time there is power involved things get controversial. We are trying to find the right balance with regards to the vanity, power, and upkeep aspects of housing.

[Tatman]

There was a large amount of feedback about the lack of usefulness of housing with regards to power in game. Any time there is power involved things get controversial. We are trying to find the right balance with regards to the vanity, power, and upkeep aspects of housing.

I didn't really see that thread, because for some reason you decided to put it in the obscure feedback section. But opposition in the previous thread(s) were bigger than the support. Obviously you ignored that.

[Suentous PO]

Any time there is power involved things get controversial. We are trying to find the right balance with regards to the vanity, power, and upkeep aspects of housing.

Agreed however this is a lesson that should have been obvious from pl,
namely, stats for plat is viewed by many as unfair.
Remember the constant complaint threads about the stats from founders helms and how a large section of players resnted that they could not achieve comparable stats?

How about black dragon sets? Once those were dc we saw like two years of complaint threads.
Granted this isn't dc, but for a worldwide game filled with people not old enough to qualify as adults, how do they compete fairly? If I understand right this isn't just a one time buy and you get stats, but it's rent for stats? No.

A better option is to have exclusive statless vanities as house rewards.

When it comes to this being a game - fair play rules. Cater to egos with vanities, they will pay. Don't ask kids to pay to have an even playing field.


-edited by JustG- reason less drama. ( I beat you to it G ;] )