Any reason why long time players still keep this huge edge in pvp that i don't know about? Why is it not being released to gen pop?
Thread: 3 pc ring
3 pc ring
Any reason why long time players still keep this huge edge in pvp that i don't know about? Why is it not being released to gen pop?
Cause they have been in the game longer than us. Just be happy we get a 2pc =)
Vigilante, your comment makes no sense. More than enough time has passed.
Just be glad its an advantage on an outdated game that is getting no more content than like an actual game worth investing time into
Not a great deal of diff between 2pc and 3pc the gap was a lot bigger before so you shud be happyOriginally Posted by Marika1
Stop qq pls.
1
I remember you advocating for mages op-ness since long. Why don't you post a thread thanking STS, Thank STS for making mage Ultra class, a stone class, whearas the weakest class is made of wood.
What would be your next thread after sts take off 3 pc? Pls sts give marika special powa, as markia get teamed sometime.
But don't worry, my vote is with you, Please STS take off 3 pc rings.
Last edited by Waug; 08-26-2016 at 09:16 AM.
@Opest I understand that your guild is food and i am not even or have any affiliations with Family members. But this isn't a reason to be upset with mages. As to mages being OP, there are plenty birds out there that completely destroy mages. From what i've seen, almost all the 3pc bears pretty much 3 shot all int mages but the 3pc str ones. And i remember when a lot of int mages stated that pallies take no skill, yet i find that the 'skill' they were referring to was spamming as fast as you can and hope to not get dodged. That's skill. I never spammed on pally. So to me, pally took WAY more skill than playing int mage. But that's another story.
Of course your a nub pally from 77 cap and now int crying about a 3pc and saying mages arent op lol.
@cuard Mages are not op, but one thing is clear, int mages take no skill. Never did even when they wore fiery. Just a lot of complainers on forum.
2pc vs 3pc doesnt even make a differenc if you can play well. Stop complaining
nothing lasts forever
I disagree. Int mages during 77 cap with lust was weak, except for those oldies who were already pro at mages. Definitely needed a lot of skill
This is not a reason to be upset with 3 PC because plenty of 2 PCs literally reks 3 PCs.
- Your own logic ( got rekt in a single line? Oops)
There are plenty of bird ... Wth I pvp so much and I hardly see but very lately I see some more birds in arena, some literally inspired by me and fam lol sometime keeping a bird with em after getting rekt by our team having a bird, lately.
And the rest, is even worthless to bother.
Last edited by Waug; 08-27-2016 at 01:23 AM.
Geez stap complaining. It's just a game breh
Back in 77 cap EVERY single class involved skill. Lust int mage in my opinion was definitely not as easy as you made it sound. Learning range has always been hugely important since 76 cap for every squishy class, and it involved a lot of skill. As others have said, either be content, or shut up. These posts don't make sts think twice at all.
Yeah i remember back at 76 when everything was balanced and before that the 66 cap when no one ever complained
bacon stamp
nothing lasts forever
Sounds like an awesome theme for a party that id love to attend
I say we make other jewelry other than rings im more into necklaces
There are some 3pc mages that show stats. I only have 1 magor and i fought a 3 pc mage who was full elite. He had better stats than me. Did simple math and came to the conclusion that a 3 pc ring is almost the exact equivalent of a mage wearing a full magor set vs a full elite one. If you beat 3 pc magor mages in pvp with your 2pc, i think it's time they quit the game! 3pc is un unfair advantage in pvp.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks