3 pc ring

**Marika1** · 08-25-2016, 04:54 PM

Any reason why long time players still keep this huge edge in pvp that i don't know about? Why is it not being released to gen pop?

**Vigilante** · 08-25-2016, 04:56 PM

Cause they have been in the game longer than us. Just be happy we get a 2pc =)

**Marika1** · 08-25-2016, 04:58 PM

Vigilante, your comment makes no sense. More than enough time has passed.

**Ssneakykills** · 08-26-2016, 01:52 AM

Originally Posted by Marika1

Vigilante, your comment makes no sense. More than enough time has passed.

Not a great deal of diff between 2pc and 3pc the gap was a lot bigger before so you shud be happy

**Vigilante** · 08-27-2016, 03:12 PM

Originally Posted by Marika1

Vigilante, your comment makes no sense. More than enough time has passed.

Geez stap complaining. It's just a game breh

**Magic Sword** · 08-25-2016, 08:28 PM

Just be glad its an advantage on an outdated game that is getting no more content than like an actual game worth investing time into

**Kingzila** · 09-25-2016, 10:33 PM

Originally Posted by Magic Sword

Just be glad its an advantage on an outdated game that is getting no more content than like an actual game worth investing time into

This, and if they did release it they could need to update the game, updating the game cost money, pl doesn't make them that kind of money, so no update.

**cuard** · 08-26-2016, 09:01 AM

Originally Posted by Marika1

Any reason why long time players still keep this huge edge in pvp that i don't know about? Why is it not being released to gen pop?

Stop qq pls.

1

**Waug** · 08-26-2016, 09:07 AM

Originally Posted by Marika1

Any reason why long time players still keep this huge edge in pvp that i don't know about? Why is it not being released to gen pop?

I remember you advocating for mages op-ness since long. Why don't you post a thread thanking STS, Thank STS for making mage Ultra class, a stone class, whearas the weakest class is made of wood.

What would be your next thread after sts take off 3 pc? Pls sts give marika special powa, as markia get teamed sometime.

But don't worry, my vote is with you, Please STS take off 3 pc rings.

**Marika1** · 08-26-2016, 01:04 PM

@Opest I understand that your guild is food and i am not even or have any affiliations with Family members. But this isn't a reason to be upset with mages. As to mages being OP, there are plenty birds out there that completely destroy mages. From what i've seen, almost all the 3pc bears pretty much 3 shot all int mages but the 3pc str ones. And i remember when a lot of int mages stated that pallies take no skill, yet i find that the 'skill' they were referring to was spamming as fast as you can and hope to not get dodged. That's skill. I never spammed on pally. So to me, pally took WAY more skill than playing int mage. But that's another story.

**cuard** · 08-26-2016, 02:01 PM

Originally Posted by Marika1

@Opest I understand that your guild is food and i am not even or have any affiliations with Family members. But this isn't a reason to be upset with mages. As to mages being OP, there are plenty birds out there that completely destroy mages. From what i've seen, almost all the 3pc bears pretty much 3 shot all int mages but the 3pc str ones. And i remember when a lot of int mages stated that pallies take no skill, yet i find that the 'skill' they were referring to was spamming as fast as you can and hope to not get dodged. That's skill. I never spammed on pally. So to me, pally took WAY more skill than playing int mage. But that's another story.

Of course your a nub pally from 77 cap and now int crying about a 3pc and saying mages arent op lol.

**Waug** · 08-27-2016, 01:18 AM

Originally Posted by Marika1

@Opest I understand that your guild is food and i am not even or have any affiliations with Family members. But this isn't a reason to be upset with mages. As to mages being OP, there are plenty birds out there that completely destroy mages. From what i've seen, almost all the 3pc bears pretty much 3 shot all int mages but the 3pc str ones. And i remember when a lot of int mages stated that pallies take no skill, yet i find that the 'skill' they were referring to was spamming as fast as you can and hope to not get dodged. That's skill. I never spammed on pally. So to me, pally took WAY more skill than playing int mage. But that's another story.

This is not a reason to be upset with 3 PC because plenty of 2 PCs literally reks 3 PCs.

- Your own logic ( got rekt in a single line? Oops)

There are plenty of bird ... Wth I pvp so much and I hardly see but very lately I see some more birds in arena, some literally inspired by me and fam lol sometime keeping a bird with em after getting rekt by our team having a bird, lately.

And the rest, is even worthless to bother.

**Marika1** · 08-26-2016, 05:20 PM

@cuard Mages are not op, but one thing is clear, int mages take no skill. Never did even when they wore fiery. Just a lot of complainers on forum.

**Giazagilur** · 08-26-2016, 11:43 PM

Originally Posted by Marika1

@cuard Mages are not op, but one thing is clear, int mages take no skill. Never did even when they wore fiery. Just a lot of complainers on forum.

I disagree. Int mages during 77 cap with lust was weak, except for those oldies who were already pro at mages. Definitely needed a lot of skill

**Burningdex** · 08-26-2016, 06:35 PM

2pc vs 3pc doesnt even make a differenc if you can play well. Stop complaining

**Marika1** · 08-29-2016, 05:19 PM

Originally Posted by Burningdex

2pc vs 3pc doesnt even make a differenc if you can play well. Stop complaining

There are some 3pc mages that show stats. I only have 1 magor and i fought a 3 pc mage who was full elite. He had better stats than me. Did simple math and came to the conclusion that a 3 pc ring is almost the exact equivalent of a mage wearing a full magor set vs a full elite one. If you beat 3 pc magor mages in pvp with your 2pc, i think it's time they quit the game! 3pc is un unfair advantage in pvp.

**Magic Sword** · 08-29-2016, 06:10 PM

Originally Posted by Marika1

i think it's time they quit the game!

Fair conclusion

**George Clooney** · 08-29-2016, 07:17 PM

Originally Posted by Marika1

There are some 3pc mages that show stats. I only have 1 magor and i fought a 3 pc mage who was full elite. He had better stats than me. Did simple math and came to the conclusion that a 3 pc ring is almost the exact equivalent of a mage wearing a full magor set vs a full elite one. If you beat 3 pc magor mages in pvp with your 2pc, i think it's time they quit the game! 3pc is un unfair advantage in pvp.

It's not unfair by any means. This advantage has always been a motivation for oldies to continue playing. As others have stated, even a full magor 3pc is beatable with 2pc. Name a mage you find unbeatable, and you can't. Even though there are many 3pc magor mages, why do you think that is?

**Marika1** · 08-29-2016, 07:47 PM

Originally Posted by George Clooney

It's not unfair by any means. This advantage has always been a motivation for oldies to continue playing. As others have stated, even a full magor 3pc is beatable with 2pc. Name a mage you find unbeatable, and you can't. Even though there are many 3pc magor mages, why do you think that is?

You ever heard the expression out with the old in with the new? There is no new...and pvp should at least give all ppl same gear to be fair, or is that not clear to you? Older players have experience and probably good ping, is that not enough?

**Burningdex** · 08-30-2016, 02:35 AM

Originally Posted by Marika1

You ever heard the expression out with the old in with the new? There is no new...and pvp should at least give all ppl same gear to be fair, or is that not clear to you? Older players have experience and probably good ping, is that not enough?

It is about as fair as they can make it with the astronomical stat levels this game has after L66, to the point where 3pc and 2pc doesn't even matter if you can play your class properly, it's what, 12 armor and like 2 dodge difference between 3pc and 2pc?