PvP at low levels

[BequietPlz✌✌]

As we all know there some players that do low level pvp whether it's l15//20//23//27//30//35 etc. But there is a gap in all those PvP lvls. I'm doing lvl 23 PvP ATM but Everytime I join a l23 PvP map it's either i see a l27 or a l30 and tbh this is BS. I think the community can give us an update where we'll be able to make our PvP maps and set a dial to where a certain pvp of a player can join that PvP map. For example if I'm doing L23 I'd make a map where me n only players that range from 20-25 can play and where there's no higher lvl to interrupt our fun.

Sent from my XT1028 using Tapatalk

[llChronicll]

I totally agree

;2844803]As we all know there some players that do low level pvp whether it's l15//20//23//27//30//35 etc. But there is a gap in all those PvP lvls. I'm doing lvl 23 PvP ATM but Everytime I join a l23 PvP map it's either i see a l27 or a l30 and tbh this is BS. I think the community can give us an update where we'll be able to make our PvP maps and set a dial to where a certain pvp of a player can join that PvP map. For example if I'm doing L23 I'd make a map where me n only players that range from 20-25 can play and where there's no higher lvl to interrupt our fun.

Sent from my XT1028 using Tapatalk

Sent from my Moto E (4) using Tapatalk

[Manu Saysay]

...just host maps 20 ... l27 is cool 30 with amulets is bs. have fun

Envoyé de mon SM-T813 en utilisant Tapatalk

[Jilsponie]

At one time there was a +-2 level restriction. Unfortunately those that just love rushing lower levels with an unfair advantage cried until it was set back to +-5 claiming twink levels "died" because of it...

Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk

[Mine AGK]

At one time there was a +-2 level restriction. Unfortunately those that just love rushing lower levels with an unfair advantage cried until it was set back to +-5 claiming twink levels "died" because of it...

Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk

That depends on the twink levels. Even though initially a L35 has the advantage over a L30, L30 can still kill a L35. Though this is boring and annoying as people will bring a L30 and rush a L35 only to get salty if they get smakt and bring a L40.

[Jensmage]

I think STS should spend some time improving low level pvps. Reason is most new players all start at a low level. Some new players tend to stick around a little and leave. A game can only thrive with new members.

[Draebatad]

I think the best next step would be a l1 stat gun to compliment the new l50 one.

[Islamiyah24]

I think the best next step would be a l1 stat gun to compliment the new l50 one.

This is cool but I think this is unfair on PvP it gives high stats while other that can't afford stat gun will only use talons and fbows.

[Draebatad]

This is cool but I think this is unfair on PvP it gives high stats while other that can't afford stat gun will only use talons and fbows.

But, life isn't fair. Anyway it just follows an already established pattern in PL.

[Jilsponie]

I do believe that would be a good way to completely kill the game... Like absolutely no new player influx. It's just simple cause and effect. New players make an account. Then level up a bit. Then try PvP. Ask what that weapon is. See how much it is. And uninstall the game. I would. You can't make a free to play game pay to win from l1. People have to get some enjoyment before they spend $$

I think the best next step would be a l1 stat gun to compliment the new l50 one.

Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk

[burntoutdex]

@OP, we at a point had restrictions to counteract having someone 10levels higher potentially being in your game. However, this led to all PvP except endgame become empty at any given time of the day - hence, it was reverted back to ±5. The game is less active now than it was back then, changing the level restrictions would only make it worse. Besides, that's what private games are for

[yannjoel]

At one time there was a +-2 level restriction. Unfortunately those that just love rushing lower levels with an unfair advantage cried until it was set back to +-5 claiming twink levels "died" because of it...

Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk

I personally had the feeling that the +/-2 level restriction really killed some parts of lowlvl pvp.
The +/- five is just fine for me. Highlevel arnt too op and you still can find enough games.

Only problem is the difference between level 29/30 because level 30 can have an enchanted amulett providing op stats.

[Communion]

Can we just make low level pvp our own little space bubble with no stat weapons at all

I like that there are no necklaces or amulets in low level pvp, can't do anything about the level 1 rings though.

[Draebatad]

I'm willing to bet, but not wager, that l1 stat weapons will debut before 2019. Again, simply based on visible trends.