Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Enchanced booting option suggestion

  1. #1
    Member Vapourised's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    249
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    30
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Default Enchanced booting option suggestion

    I think we can all agree that there are some players who we boot but then they can come back when the next game changes host. We already have a booting feature to exclude players we do not wish to play with so what o suggest:

    Have a ban option where you can add players. These players would then never be able to join the pvp games you host. This way we donít have to keep booting players again and again. Keep the host of the game the same throughout.

    I made this post because people think itís funny to rush someone with an elite set at endgame but all it does is ruin the fun of others. The same can be said for players who play other levels other than endgame. Sometimes you just want to play with friends as well as other decent folk bar a few people.

    Hosting private is a good counterarguement I guess but it doesnít always gauruntee a full game. Nor would your friends always be available for pvp. It would be nice to play with people who you donít know as well but who arenít going to be a pain as well. Hence the advanced booting option.

    Hope I made sense. Feel free to suggest tweaks.
    Also Cinco feel free to tell me if there any problems with this.
    I think it should be relatively straightforward to implement and would be a great QoL feature.

    Can we have this at all levels?

  2. #2
    Member Naetheanimal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    44
    Thanked in
    28 Posts

    Default

    No thanks, keep booting

  3. #3
    Tournament & Ladder Leader XghostzX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    7,532
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,317
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,092
    Thanked in
    1,196 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Naetheanimal View Post
    No thanks, keep booting
    I think it's a fine solution, +1

  4. #4
    Member Islamiyah24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    125
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    59
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    15 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vapourised View Post
    I think we can all agree that there are some players who we boot but then they can come back when the next game changes host. We already have a booting feature to exclude players we do not wish to play with so what o suggest:

    Have a ban option where you can add players. These players would then never be able to join the pvp games you host. This way we donít have to keep booting players again and again. Keep the host of the game the same throughout.

    I made this post because people think itís funny to rush someone with an elite set at endgame but all it does is ruin the fun of others. The same can be said for players who play other levels other than endgame. Sometimes you just want to play with friends as well as other decent folk bar a few people.

    Hosting private is a good counterarguement I guess but it doesnít always gauruntee a full game. Nor would your friends always be available for pvp. It would be nice to play with people who you donít know as well but who arenít going to be a pain as well. Hence the advanced booting option.

    Hope I made sense. Feel free to suggest tweaks.
    Also Cinco feel free to tell me if there any problems with this.
    I think it should be relatively straightforward to implement and would be a great QoL feature.

    Can we have this at all levels?
    Tbh it's a good suggestion but separating the map of l100 and l105 honor is the best way
    It's because if you boot them, yes they can't join anymore but the problem is they can still merge the game host while in separate map if you merge it's still fair because everyone is using the same honor sets.

  5. #5
    Member Devaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    195
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    92
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    34
    Thanked in
    25 Posts

    Default

    Just make the game private ehh??????

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    16
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Default

    No then I won't be able to join 80% of pvp games


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Member Vapourised's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    249
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    30
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Devaux View Post
    Just make the game private ehh??????
    I believe I addressed the issue of private games in the original post. Should have read it instead of just the title and posting stuff like this.

  8. #8
    Member Vapourised's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    249
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    30
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Islamiyah24 View Post
    Tbh it's a good suggestion but separating the map of l100 and l105 honor is the best way
    It's because if you boot them, yes they can't join anymore but the problem is they can still merge the game host while in separate map if you merge it's still fair because everyone is using the same honor sets.
    Insightful post. Ty for sharing. However, endgame is not the only level people play. Sometimes you see people playing L45 twink pvp but some L50 nub/troll decides to boost with QTR. The change I propose would quite literally kill 2 birds with one stone. Yes youíre right about merging. Iím not sure how to get around it but Iím interested d into why this was never fixed in the 10 years PL has existed.

  9. #9
    Member Vapourised's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    249
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    30
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Default

    I don't like bumping threads so sorry everyone but need a response from Cinco so I'm not left in the dark.

    @Cinco is this suggestion feasible?

  10. #10
    Member Devaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    195
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    92
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    34
    Thanked in
    25 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vapourised View Post
    I believe I addressed the issue of private games in the original post. Should have read it instead of just the title and posting stuff like this.
    Oh quit beint so sensitive sheesh
    IGN- Monetization/Harmless/Residential

    PL 8 year vet (retired) - AL 4 year citizen


  11. #11
    Senior Member Waug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,302
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    272
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    634
    Thanked in
    445 Posts

    Default

    If the new spwn system was never reverted back, which can lead upto 7 respwn consecutively same location (Didn't count more bcz rage quit already on cinco XD after that ), there's something like 0.0000001% chance something new of these type happening near future.


    Time to find that person who suggested the change in spwn system.
    Last edited by Waug; 09-22-2020 at 06:34 AM.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Waug For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Enchanced shadowspire wing
    By hyxx in forum AL General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-18-2020, 11:58 AM
  2. Suggestion: pet behaviour option
    By Lubricator in forum AL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-03-2013, 06:42 AM
  3. suggestion: New option for pl and sl
    By Skeletonlord in forum PL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2011, 02:30 AM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 07:26 PM
  5. The Booting reason and Suggestion
    By LIGHTNINGLORD67 in forum PL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-10-2011, 10:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •