Changes to Equipment Procs: Shared Equipment Cooldowns

[Willl]

Market isnt killed(Good riddance Glint), warriors are not useless. It isnt Rogue Legends. Pretty sure warriors can still hit insane damage numbers. We don't know what the new arc procs are. Dont know how the new maps will go. Ect ect.

Im a mage but warriors without proc stacking cant kill mobs, at bosses with rage ulti can do some dmg, but nothing op.

Mage without skratch staff and gun to stack proc cant kill bosses at all

This update makes rogues the best cause 1-hit target with 1 weapon is what rog always did, single target at mob and bosses

Inviato dal mio Redmi Note 8 Pro utilizzando Tapatalk

[THE GOLDEN KING]

While your at it, you can get rid of belt procs,armor procs. Better to have secondary class items as passives not procs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Encryptions]

Wait but weren’t you one of defensors of full warrior pt on challange events before?
And If we talk about class rivalry, rogues have been excluded a lot lately to evg.
Sts decided it, not rogues tho.

No. I was one who asked for sts to make open class temple teams as in 1 rog 1 mage 1 war. I did the 4 war pt so they would see why they should change it.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[trade]

I dont really care about all this pve since its useless and boring already 3 expansions, like who cares how fast you kill brainless mobs lol, or how many waves u can do in evg 10 or 1000, they all same lol; but I'm sure the most logical would be allow to stack 2 different type weapons like duggar daggers with duggar bow (but not allow duggar daggers with ebon daggers), or skull axe + skull aegis/glint aegis (but not allow together skull aegis and glint aegis), skratch gun and scratch staff etc...

[Cinco]

Already thought through the "allow 2" or "allow (n)" number of abusive procs... and the answer is 'no.' Keeping any measure of the proc overlap is problematic.

[Fearrr]

Thanks for taking the time to make this Thread. +1 for at least being able to stack up to 2 Weapon Procs.

[Formature]

Already thought through the "allow 2" or "allow (n)" number of abusive procs... and the answer is 'no.' Keeping any measure of the proc overlap is problematic.

we understand it's problematic but the question is, this is 2 years ago and you never realized it was problematic? why the delay to nerf? I should have done this from the beginning and then it wouldn't have caused so much anger from the players (I'm just asking a question).

Enviado de meu SM-J260M usando o Tapatalk

[Encryptions]

Already thought through the "allow 2" or "allow (n)" number of abusive procs... and the answer is 'no.' Keeping any measure of the proc overlap is problematic.

This still hurts mages but instead of a cool down on procs just disable proc weapon a when you proc weapon B.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[Zestee]

Am I understanding this correctly: If your altar guardian bauble proc's, giving you an int boost (not so useful to rogue or warrior), then it blocks your weapon and armour proc. So you'll want to adjust your sets so that only the gear with awesome proc's are included, yes?

[Fearrr]

Already thought through the "allow 2" or "allow (n)" number of abusive procs... and the answer is 'no.' Keeping any measure of the proc overlap is problematic.

When you did your tests did you consider the Pull Weapons we use as Wars? Just asking that is all.

[Formature]

we understand it's problematic but the question is, this is 2 years ago and you never realized it was problematic? why the delay to nerf? I should have done this from the beginning and then it wouldn't have caused so much anger from the players (I'm just asking a question).

Enviado de meu SM-J260M usando o Tapatalk

this has been in the game for almost 2 years****

Enviado de meu SM-J260M usando o Tapatalk

[Cinco]

Am I understanding this correctly: If your altar guardian bauble proc's, giving you an int boost (not so useful to rogue or warrior), then it blocks your weapon and armour proc. So you'll want to adjust your sets so that only the gear with awesome proc's are included, yes?

No.

Gear in the same slot shares a cooldown.

Your example involves items in different gear slots.

[Synergia]

I think warriors wont be able to play evg anymore from now on...
Let's hope new bosses drops a fair amount of gold

[Polosam]

Am I understanding this correctly: If your altar guardian bauble proc's, giving you an int boost (not so useful to rogue or warrior), then it blocks your weapon and armour proc. So you'll want to adjust your sets so that only the gear with awesome proc's are included, yes?

No. Each equipment gear will have different time lock , (weapons for weapons, armors for armors etc)

Στάλθηκε από το M2012K11AG μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk

[Jiubara]

Nice way of killing tank role, and some of the nices tank weapons i.e glint aegis go ahead and just delete the weapons which rely on proc stacking, dumbest sh*t ive ever seen happening in AL.

[Cinco]

this has been in the game for almost 2 years****

Enviado de meu SM-J260M usando o Tapatalk

As they say: "Better late than never."

[THE GOLDEN KING]

As they say: "Better late than never."

Can you give belts/rings/armors/ect… passives instead of procs?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Encryptions]

What do you plan to do with temple? Theres no way for anyone to get higher points than eachother since we are all limited to the same exact thing?

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[XxretepxX]

As they say: "Better late than never."

Will the team ever reconsider this decision or any changes in the future?

Sent from my LM-K500 using Tapatalk

[Willl]

I tought it was impossible ruin a great expansion, well I was wrong xd

Inviato dal mio Redmi Note 8 Pro utilizzando Tapatalk