Direct criticism on AL no toxicity

[arcanefid]

Calling some an idiot etc isn't criticism. Explaining the points as to why their ideas are bad and giving better ideas is criticism.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Legit curious, who mentioned the word idiot here? And I put an argument to each of your points in the first page and you haven't answered any of them. You can't take any counter-argument, even less criticism.

[Encryptions]

Legit curious, who mentioned the word idiot here? And I put an argument to each of your points in the first page and you haven't answered any of them. You can't take any counter-argument, even less criticism.

Your points were good, I did read them. The thing about weapons I mainly just want access to multiple weapons they don't have to have proc combos but just more weapons for us with different game play types. People helping as the devs can inv some players to a test server to have them find exploits.
I was towards the ones who disagree and instead of explaining why; they choose to say random stuff that isn't needed.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[arcanefid]

Your points were good, I did read them. The thing about weapons I mainly just want access to multiple weapons they don't have to have proc combos but just more weapons for us with different game play types. People helping as the devs can inv some players to a test server to have them find exploits.
I was towards the ones who disagree and instead of explaining why; they choose to say random stuff that isn't needed.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Alright then. Don't worry. Warrior will still be good. If warrior class gets too bad we can just come here and tell Cinco, he will fix us.