Results 1 to 20 of 167

  Click here to go to the first Dev post in this thread.   Thread: LB players events and multiples accounts unfair

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Forum Adept Apocalyptis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    438
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    305
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    185
    Thanked in
    113 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LichKing1 View Post
    now imagine all other throwers r amateurs and u give top spots to them, u cant compare events in AL with real life, top athletes go thro some sort of qualifying while we dont
    I have run countless lb events and i can tell u from experience that if temple events didnt have alts allowed, the top10 would be way too easy

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
    So basically only #1 is a “pro” and others are “amateurs”? Sure, but the leaderboard is still about top10 players, doesn’t matter how you call them. “u give top spots to them”? No. That’s what they achieved based on their perfomance, you wouldn’t normally care if you were already #1.

    I respect that it takes more effort to be first than last, but giving the first guy 10x the same reward, that was meant for others? That’s just wrong.

    It wouldn’t be easy, it would just be fair (and how it is meant to be). This only shows the greediness from your side. There is nothing bad about letting the 10th guy be 10th, since you are far ahead lol.
    <Elite Runners>

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Apocalyptis For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Posts
    364
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    38
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    48
    Thanked in
    43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apocalyptis View Post
    So basically only #1 is a “pro” and others are “amateurs”? Sure, but the leaderboard is still about top10 players, doesn’t matter how you call them. “u give top spots to them”? No. That’s what they achieved based on their perfomance, you wouldn’t normally care if you were already #1.

    I respect that it takes more effort to be first than last, but giving the first guy 10x the same reward, that was meant for others? That’s just wrong.

    It wouldn’t be easy, it would just be fair (and how it is meant to be). This only shows the greediness from your side. There is nothing bad about letting the 10th guy be 10th, since you are far ahead lol.
    if u were competing u would understand, for example during temple, apox had 5 alts in top10 and a few more under, it didnt stop me or a few other players who managed to score almost same pts and be top10, these events r designed in a way that theres an upper limit every player can reach and if u didnt score it, u literally dont deserve the prize in my eyes, cuz of the way waves scaled
    if prizes were scaling per each spot, then for sure dont allow alts

    Sent from my SM-G988N using Tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. Unfair players!!!!!
    By Mrops|AL in forum AL General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-31-2020, 10:11 PM
  2. PvP and CTF match ups with higher ranked players is unfair
    By itsjustmk in forum DL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-04-2013, 12:33 AM
  3. suggestion: ban players/accounts from guild
    By tearacan in forum SL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-11-2012, 01:30 PM
  4. Sharing accounts with other players
    By wizardstarr in forum SL General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-17-2011, 08:20 PM
  5. sharing accounts with other players
    By wizardstarr in forum PL General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-17-2011, 08:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •