Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: One LB for a single Alt

  1. #1
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Red face One LB for a single Alt

    Hello, it is incredible the potential that some players have to put their alts and occupy several positions at the top. Perhaps leaving some players who try hard without a chance.

    Now that we are so open to opening several Lbs in events, what if a new LB is created but with the strict rule that it is for a player without ALTS?

    Nobody argues or fights with the most powerful players who have their alts, their Lb remains the same.

    But a new LB for a single player per account and even I don't know how clever it is to restrict or for the system to detect the IP. It should be innovative, and this Lb should be very exclusive, with non-tradeable rewards. Oh well this is open to ideas!

    Because it is not a lie that some players are more motivated to win 5 tradeables LB vanity sets and the corrupted jewels to sell. It became a big business.

    But, if the new LB gives even bound rewards like a bound corrupted jewels it makes the challenge more competitive and fair.

    I think nothing changes, players and alts can continue to occupy the 20 LB positions each event, only now those of us who have few opportunities will have it if this new LB is created.

    Maybe new ones can emerge from my idea, I hope it doesn't generate hatred and that together we can build and change this issue. That few dare to speak.




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hercules For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Default

    I'm not a picky person, and I get to thinking about the game's art team. I know it would be somewhat complex to create more designs. But believe me as a player I would be happy to compete for a corrupted jewels. That's all.




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  4. #3
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Default

    I did a small survey in my union, and many are discouraged from competing because as they say: "You already know that those prizes will go to the same 6-7 players as always" It is sad and this is another big problem why there is little interest and participation in this temple. It's what I perceive. It's like all my friends were robbed of their hopes.




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  5. #4
    Member Sue.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Location
    Perpendicular to everything
    Posts
    192
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    89
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    135
    Thanked in
    64 Posts

    Default

    What’s the difference between 1 person with 2 alts & 1 person with 2 devices & 2 acc’s?

    Or, how can your idea not be exploited when sts admits they can’t tell who is who
    \m/____( >. < ‘ )____,\m/
    Suentous
    Chivalrous Union

  6. #5
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Default

    Good analogy, that is the point between all of us looking for an idea that provides a solution. I think the solution may be non-tradeable rewards, something that does not motivate so many accounts to participate. Or create a system that identifies the player's IP and prevents them from using their multiple accounts.




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  7. #6
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Default

    Now I was thinking about another one, I don't know how viable it is.

    1. Leave the LB with its tradeable prizes as it is.
    2. Create A parallel LB with equal rewards but all non-tradeable.
    3. There would be 3 options when entering a portal.
    A. Alone
    B. Group
    C. Exclusive (New) Non-tradeable rewards - If this detracts from the value of the vanitys then let the reward be a bound corrupted and 50 bound elite awakening gems

    I think that by having non-tradeable rewards we reduce the interest of multi-accounts. I suppose there is no impact. And all happy




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  8. #7
    Luminary Poster Encryptions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Many places.
    Posts
    5,530
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    103
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,279
    Thanked in
    1,102 Posts

    Default

    I can use 10 phones on different wifi's and get lb on each even if they did the ip thing. There is no way to restrict this no matter what they do tbh.
    Those players with lower gears can go for the top score that adds up.

    Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    111
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    25
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    56
    Thanked in
    27 Posts

    Lightbulb possible solution

    it is true that it's discouraging for many to even try to run lb when all the well geared players can just use the same gear on alts(on same account or different accounts) to secure another spot on lb

    now as some1 else said on a different thread it is also true that even if one can run on alts it still takes the gear, skills, knowledge, time and effort to do it and this keeps the lb somewhat competitive
    but would it had been more or less competitive if all of us who gave up on lb early on would've not been discouraged? who knows?

    in the end it depends on what sts wants and how they see things

    banning the ip is not a reliable idea; it can be easily bypassed

    i've been thinking about a way to make it so that one cannot get multiple slots on lb and here's a possible way to make that happen:
    • requirements for lb: gear, skills, knowledge, time and effort
    • sts can't do anything about the latter
    • but they can do something about the first one


    The idea:
    • make all the gear a player enters the event with completely bound(unstashable and untradeable) for the duration of the event
    • every piece of gear one has in the inventory when entering the event for the first time becomes completely character bound until the event ends
    • the player would receive a warning stating exactly this when attempting to enter the event for the first time
    • this way alts become irrelevant(no matter how many one has on the same account or different accounts)
    • this does seem a bit harsh but it's quite an easy solution


    Drawbacks:
    • most of us who considered running lb have spent a lot of time/money/effort to gear up and also to make those alts, invest in them(time to lvl up and loadouts for each for example)
    • i myself made some alts specifically for this reason(even if i have none on lb rn)


    so in the end would the dissatisfaction of these few players who can "exploit" this be less important to sts than the satisfaction of the other people who feel like the op of this thread(discouraged by multiple alts on lb)?
    i myself am not sure; which is why i said "exploit"; i understand both points of view: one feels robbed of the chance for a lb reward and the other feels entitled to it since he can obtain it
    Last edited by iulicutu; 06-26-2024 at 07:57 PM. Reason: correcting typos

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to iulicutu For This Useful Post:


  11. #9
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iulicutu View Post
    it is true that it's discouraging for many to even try to run lb when all the well geared players can just use the same gear on alts(on same account or different accounts) to secure another spot on lb

    now as some1 else said on a different thread it is also true that even if one can run on alts it still takes the gear, skills, knowledge, time and effort to do it and this keeps the lb somewhat competitive
    but would it had been more or less competitive if all of us who gave up on lb early on would've not been discouraged? who knows?

    in the end it depends on what sts wants and how they see things

    banning the ip is not a reliable idea; it can be easily bypassed

    i've been thinking about a way to make it so that one cannot get multiple slots on lb and here's a possible way to make that happen:
    • requirements for lb: gear, skills, knowledge, time and effort
    • sts can't do anything about the latter
    • but they can do something about the first one


    The idea:
    • make all the gear a player enters the event with completely bound(unstashable and untradeable) for the duration of the event
    • every piece of gear one has in the inventory when entering the event for the first time becomes completely character bound until the event ends
    • the player would receive a warning stating exactly this when attempting to enter the event for the first time
    • this way alts become irrelevant(no matter how many one has on the same account or different accounts)
    • this does seem a bit harsh but it's quite an easy solution


    Drawbacks:
    • most of us who considered running lb have spent a lot of time/money/effort to gear up and also to make those alts, invest in them(time to lvl up and loadouts for each for example)
    • i myself made some alts specifically for this reason(even if i have none on lb rn)


    so in the end would the dissatisfaction of these few players who can "exploit" this be less important to sts than the satisfaction of the other people who feel like the op of this thread(discouraged by multiple alts on lb)?
    i myself am not sure; which is why i said "exploit"; i understand both points of view: one feels robbed of the chance for a lb reward and the other feels entitled to it since he can obtain it
    This is an incredible idea, very rich and with many interesting things. Thank you for contributing to building a better LB




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  12. #10
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Posts
    353
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    22 Posts

    Default

    i kindly suggest you guys to get better at it

  13. #11
    Senior Member drawfflerz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Play AL since 2013
    Posts
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    105
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    78
    Thanked in
    60 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Encryptions View Post
    I can use 10 phones on different wifi's and get lb on each even if they did the ip thing. There is no way to restrict this no matter what they do tbh.
    Those players with lower gears can go for the top score that adds up.

    Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk
    there is a way to do it. such as, register the item we use on the main alt for lb, and cant stash and locked it on single alt until last day of event.

    Sent from my POCOPHONE F1 using Tapatalk

  14. #12
    Luminary Poster Encryptions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Many places.
    Posts
    5,530
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    103
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,279
    Thanked in
    1,102 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drawfflerz View Post
    there is a way to do it. such as, register the item we use on the main alt for lb, and cant stash and locked it on single alt until last day of event.

    Sent from my POCOPHONE F1 using Tapatalk
    This would just enrage merchants and people who don't play the event but level their alts.

    Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

  15. #13
    Senior Member Snowman Is here's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    East Antarctic Plateau
    Posts
    674
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    285
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    Or or or….simply make separate lb for geared users and one that is a little similar to honor gear, everyone enters with same gear, no awakes, no crazy separation between power, just skill.

  16. #14
    Senior Member Snowman Is here's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    East Antarctic Plateau
    Posts
    674
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    285
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    this way if there is any individual with enough skill (not abusing bugs) to dominate the lb then who can complain then?
    Of course this should be a separate lb apart from the original.

  17. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    18
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    Haters gonna hate lol

  18. #16
    Member Iahiasakt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Emirates
    Posts
    113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    54
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    13 Posts

    Default One LB for a single Alt

    I truly feel most of the ideas above wont be implemented.

    Banning IP is obviously a terrible idea and makes no sense at all.
    Something like making certain items bound post entering the event is something that has never been done in the game for the past 11 years of the game’s existence and I doubt it will be. I also frankly think its against the spirit of the game to make a tradable item suddenly untradable. There is also the issue where the vast majority of players just try it out for fun to check how far they can go (including me). Iam sure they wouldn’t want their items bound for a period of 14 days. That makes no sense.

    The amount of backlash this LB system is receiving is astounding. Calling the ridiculous monopoly opportunities created for the high geared players unfair would be nothing but an understatement. This backlash without a viable solution might I believe end in the cessation of existence of such an lb.

    Coming to the only viable options thus far. One of them is to make all gear entry equal and make the lb completely based on skill (This will enrage the players who have spent time and money to collect and upgrade their gears but it will certainly make the lb extremely fair which should be the point of a leaderboard).
    The other and more simpler way is to make the lb items bound. This will remove the unfair (from my perspective) advantage of a monopoly system given to the ultra geared, which have varying degrees of impact in an mmorpg game like this.

    That being said Iam not interested in competing for the lb as Iam severely undergeared. My opinion is purely based on what I believe to be fair and will protect the spirit of a leaderboard.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    "Victoria Concordia Crescit"-Find out the meaning yourself

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Iahiasakt For This Useful Post:


  20. #17
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Posts
    353
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    22 Posts

    Default

    Name:  Screenshot_2024-06-28-07-41-18-77_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  300.2 KB
    thx .

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Adek Nakal For This Useful Post:


  22. #18
    Blogger Hercules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    739
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,436
    Thanked in
    289 Posts

    Default

    We already know, that will never change, I only suggest a new LB, a parallel one but everything bound. Or what was previously said




    [Gamer 🎮] [Public Loudspeaker 📢] [Forum adept 🔧] [Economist 💰] [Positive user 💡] [Verified Profile ✔️]

  23. #19
    Senior Member Ilove_Poopoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    South East Asia
    Posts
    2,316
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    164
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    615
    Thanked in
    327 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hercules View Post
    I did a small survey in my union, and many are discouraged from competing because as they say: "You already know that those prizes will go to the same 6-7 players as always" It is sad and this is another big problem why there is little interest and participation in this temple. It's what I perceive. It's like all my friends were robbed of their hopes.
    And yet the same excuse is still the "same players will win it" narrative. Why aren't there more people who can do better next time? This game has barely any players relative to other games with hundreds of thousands competing.

    Players are more focused on blaming the winners who put all their effort throughout the years into polishing their gameplay instead of learning to be one of them.

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ilove_Poopoo For This Useful Post:


  25. #20
    Senior Member Snowman Is here's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    East Antarctic Plateau
    Posts
    674
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    285
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ilove_Poopoo View Post
    And yet the same excuse is still the "same players will win it" narrative. Why aren't there more people who can do better next time? This game has barely any players relative to other games with hundreds of thousands competing.

    Players are more focused on blaming the winners who put all their effort throughout the years into polishing their gameplay instead of learning to be one of them.
    Polishing off their credit cards over the years maybe, not much competition to be had between the players who pay and the ones who can’t afford every new set that releases every 3 weeks. It’s boring.

    Whenever sts releases events/gameplay that literally anyone and everyone can play to the full extent of their ability purely based on skill or teamwork without having to sacrifice an arm and a leg for the gears necessary to get lb spots or decent rewards is when this game thrives.

Similar Threads

  1. Suggestion(s) Alt
    By Openi in forum PL Player vs. Player
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-26-2014, 08:42 AM
  2. Can anyone help my alt?
    By Jahova in forum SL General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-30-2012, 10:24 PM
  3. Alt acc for now
    By razerfingers in forum PL General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-02-2012, 10:47 PM
  4. I do have secret alt's!
    By Elysony in forum PL General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-02-2012, 07:15 AM
  5. a little help leveling my alt please
    By gnardog666 in forum PL General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 10:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •