Quote Originally Posted by Bluehazee View Post
Aegis can kill zodias bosses in 1-2 hits (i saw it), yet people say that sword is even better. Maybe both are broken?
It seems like everyone is fine with warriors having this power, so what's the purpose of mage and rogue? Mage's rifle needs 2 full procs to kill a boss in normal maps, and rogue's bow deals less dmg than warrior weapons too. I really dont understand how this is ok.

And i see warriors asking for better performance at mobs, and saying that staff is good at bosses? Cmon
For aegis do instakill or 2 hits zodias boss u need ult,
Many ppl says sword better but i don't think that, with aegis u can easily do 3.5m hit(with vg skill and 1 .7k str) at orrick, and instakill if get chasmal proc
While sword u need proc and charge and do basic attacks(which for reach aegis damage u need haste, vg and ult)
Gun is very good on bosses, principally when ebon armor proc.
Staff very good on mobs, helpful for wars that atm don't have much area damage.
I look at a pt that contais every class and its very good, every proc help in anything on the run.
Don't think wars should have their weapon nerfed, just buff others weapons and that's ok i guess..