Im sorry, but a warrior has to charge heal to get 2sec invulnerability - I dont see why this should be different for a mage.
Im sorry, but a warrior has to charge heal to get 2sec invulnerability - I dont see why this should be different for a mage.
Credits to Iady
But Warriors have better survival than a sorc even if theres a delay.Originally Posted by TheMiraclebird:1207786
Last edited by Cero; 08-03-2013 at 08:43 AM.
They should just fic the bug in next update, smurf will be OP. their armor an hp raising. They'll survive with charging
Cant compare warriors speciality with a mages hp, I can argue that a mage has easily 100+ dmg than a warrior. Cant get the best of both worlds!Originally Posted by Cero:1207889
Credits to Iady
Lol,Originally Posted by TheMiraclebird:1207925
they dont.
Last edited by Cero; 08-03-2013 at 09:28 AM.
Sorry to say that but this thread is ridiculous. Rogues complaining cause they can't 1 shot mages while shield is available?? Pff
You have absolutely minimal comprehensive skills, otherwise said as: can you read? No?Originally Posted by Otawaazavie:1208204
I simply reported a bug. The skill description is misleading and the bug should be fixed JUST like the warrior windmill glitch that was fixed.
Credits to Iady
Few months ago, after an update the warrior windmill skill (you cant put any upgrades in it or it wouldnt work) did equal damage to a rogue and hit 2k crits per tick on L16. It was HUGE damage, most in my L16 bracket abused it.Originally Posted by Taejo:1208249
Credits to Iady
Mages hp are equal to rogues generally speaking. While rogues armor is over 1k and mages armor is like 750-800. Shield only lasts for 15 seconds with 15 second cool down. They should nerf rogues armor because every rogue now uses a bow and I don't see why rogues should have armor equal to warriors if rogues aren't melee fighters. And you are all complaining that we get 2 secs of invulnerability for not charging? If the fight lasts longer then 15 seconds you have 15 secons to one shot a mage so how is that fair? Wait 2 seconds before you fire your aimed shot, how hard is that?
I didnt endgame then --"Originally Posted by Cero:1208482
You dont see many sorcs in L16/21
Credits to Iady
blah I've said my part.....
I'll wait and see how devs will react to this rogue request.
Just fix the description.
2 sec invulnerable if not charged. 4 sec if charged.
Rogue just can't wait for 2 sec wtf? After all their aim shot is 2 sec cooldown.
no....just no...thats horribly opOriginally Posted by moot:1209170
Credits to Iady
And a mage doesnt just stand there when the shield is in 4sec invulnerability. The mage can easily nuke a rogue in 4 seconds - them being unharmed....Common sense isnt common anymore :/Originally Posted by moot:1209229
Credits to Iady
Bookmarks